Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Md Attaullah vs The State Of Jharkhand on 26 April, 2013

Author: Jaya Roy

Bench: Jaya Roy

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                               B.A. No. 3122 of 2013
                                          ­­­­­­
              Md. Attaullah                      .... .... .... Petitioner
                                     Versus
              The State of Jharkhand             .... .... ....     Opp. Party
                                          ­­­­­­
              CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
                                          ­­­­­­  
              For the Petitioner          : Mr. K.P. Choudhary, Advocate
              For the State               : A.P.P.
                                          ­­­­­­
               
02/26.04.2013

Heard   counsel   appearing for the petitioner and counsel  appearing for the State.

Petitioner   is   an   accused   in   this   case   registered   under  Sections   467/468/489A/489B/489E/420/34   of   the   Indian   Penal  Code.

Counsel   appearing   for   the   petitioner   has  submitted  that  according to the allegation made in the F.I.R. is only fifty (50) fake  currency notes of Rs.500/­ have been recovered from the possession  of   the   petitioner.   Therefore,   at   best   the   petitioner   can   be   made  accused only under Section 489E of the Indian Penal Code. It is also  submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 29th December, 2012.

Counsel   appearing   for   the   State   has   opposed   but   not  disputed the aforesaid contentions made by the counsel appearing for  the   petitioner   and   he   has   also   accepted   that   there   is   recovery   of  50 fake currency notes of Rs.500/­.

Considering the submissions made by both the parties and  considering   the   period   of   custody   of   the   petitioner,  the   petitioner,  above  named, is directed to be released on bail,  on furnishing bail  bond   of   Rs.   10,000/­   (Rs.   Ten   thousand)   with  two   sureties  of   like  amount each to the satisfaction of Shri T. Ahmad, Judicial Magistrate,  1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No. 340  of   2012   corresponding   to   G.R.   No.   3851   of   2012   subject   to  the  condition   that   one   of   the   bailors   will   be   local   resident   having  immovable property within the jurisdiction of district concerned.

(Jaya Roy, J.) Anit