Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 22]

Allahabad High Court

Deepak Kumar Singhal And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 9 July, 2019

Bench: Ramesh Sinha, Raj Beer Singh





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 44
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1020 of 2019
 

 
Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Singhal And 4 Others
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Tripathi,Mandvi Tripathi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Santosh Singh
 

 
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
 

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

Heard Sri Santosh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Santosh Singh learned counsel for the private respondent, Sri Jai Narain, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 25.12.2018 registered as case crime no. 1319 of 2018 under sections 147, 307, 504, 506, 323 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, police station Modi Nagar Thana, District Ghaziabad.

Having scanned the allegations contained in the F.I.R. the Court is of the view that the allegations in the F.I.R. do disclose commission of cognizable offence and/therefore no ground is made out warranting interference by this Court. The prayer for quashing the same is refused.

The petitioner/s has also prayed for an interim order to stay the arrest during the course of investigation relating to the FIR that is sought to be quashed in this petition. In view of the judgment of Apex Court passed the case of State of Orissa vs. Madan Gopal Rungta reported in AIR 1952 SC 12 and Kala Bharti Advertising vs. Hemant Vimal Nath Narichania & ors. reported in 2010 (9) SCC 437 when we are not inclined to grant the main relief sought by the petitioner/s, it would not be appropriate to grant the ancillary relief. Beside that the petitioner, who is apprehending his arrest is having an efficacious remedy of filing an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) to have anticipatory bail.

The petitioner/s may avail such remedy if so advised. As there appears to be an interim order passed in this petition by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 9.5.2019 staying arrest of the petitioner/s, the same shall remain continue till 25th July, 2019, provided the petitioner/s move an application before the Court competent as per provisions of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) on or before 22nd July, 2019.

The petition for writ is disposed of accordingly.

(Raj Beer Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 9.7.2019 A. Dewal