Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Bangalore District Court

E.S.I. Corporation vs Chairperson on 1 July, 2022

    IN THE COURT OF XXXVIII ADDL.CHIEF METROPPOLITAN
                MAGISTRATE, BENGALULRU

              Present : Sri. P. Shivaraj,
                                   B.Com. LL.B.
                        XXXVIII A.C.M.M Bengaluru
              Dated this the 1st day of July - 2022
                      C.C.NO: 7219/2018

COMPLAINANT:­            E.S.I. Corporation,
                         Rep. Sri.S.Chandrashekar ­ Social Security
                         Officer,
                         No.23, 9th B and 10th C Main,
                         BTM Ring Road,
                         Opp. I.O.C. Petrol Bunk
                         Bengaluru - 560029.
                                    (Sri. K.Krishnappa,Advocate.)
                                     // VS //
[
                         Smt.Dr.Syamala Reddy
ACCUSED:­
                         Chairperson
                         M/s.SGR Technical and Educational
                         Society, No.111/1, SGR Colllege
                         Main Road, Munnekolala,
                         Marthahalli Post, Bangalore­560 037.
                          (Sri. K.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate.)

Offence                  : U/s/ 138 of N.I Act of 1881.
Plea of accused          : Pleaded not guilty.
Final Order              : Accused is convicted.
Date of judgment         : 01/07/2022




                                            (P. SHIVARAJ)
                                            XXXVIII A.C.M.M.
                                              Bengaluru.
                                                           C.C.No.7219/2018


                        ­: J U D G E M E N T :­
       The complainant is a Government Organization and
is a statutory body constituted u/S.3 of the Employees
State Insurance Act 1948 and its Social Security Officer
Mr.S.Chandrasekar has filed private complaint U/s 200
of Cr.P.C. against the accused alleging that, accused has
committed the offence punishable under section 138 of
Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881( For short N.I.Act,1881).
2.     Complainant case is as follows:­
       Complainant is a Government Organization. Accused
is the Chairperson of M/s.SGR Technical and Educational
Society and it is covered under the provisions of
Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.
       Accused has failed to pay the contribution amount of
Rs.2,90,002/­ payable to the complainant organization as
per    Section      40    of     ESI   Act.    Hence,     complainant
organization issued the recovery certificate u/S.45 of the
said    Act,     vide    claim    No.C­19     on   16/6/2015        and
13/08/2015, for Rs.1,53,737/­ and Rs.1,36,265/­. In
order to pay the said contribution amount, accused has
issued the cheque bearing No.423158 dated 15/12/2017
for    Rs.1,97,788/­        in    favour      of   the    complainant
organization which is drawn on Indian Bank, Bangalore
Branch.
       3.   As     per    the     instructions     of    the   accused
complainant organistion presented the aforesaid cheque
                                                C.C.No.7219/2018


for encashment through its banker. The aforesaid cheque
was returned dishonoured with an endorsement "Funds
Insufficient", to that effect, complainant organisation
received the cheque return memo from its banker on
26/12/2017. Complainant organisation informed the
aforesaid fact to the accused and it has issued legal notice
by way of RPAD to the accused on 11/01/2018 and it was
duly served on her. Further, accused failed to repay the
cheque amount. Complainant organization alleged that,
accused has intentionally not maintained the sufficient
amount in her bank account to honour the cheque.
Inasmuch, accused has committed the offence punishable
under section 138 of N.I. Act. On the aforesaid allegations,
the complainant organization approached this court and
prays this court to punish the accused and to award the
compensation.
     4. Originally the private complaint was filed before
Hon'ble XXVCMM court Bengaluru. The learned presiding
officer of that court, took the cognizance for the offence
punishable U/s 138 of N.I.Act and recorded. On finding
prima­facie case, process was issued to the accused.
     Later as per special notification No. ADM/1/5/2020
dt.26.05.2020, case is transferred to this court.
     5. After service of the summons to the accused, she
appeared before this court through her counsel, and she
got released on bail. In compliance with provision of
                                                          C.C.No.7219/2018


section of 207 of Cr.P.C. papers of the prosecution were
supplied to the accused. The substance of the accusation
is readout to accused, in the language known to her, she
pledged not guilty and submit that she is having defense
to make.
     6. In order to prove the guilty of the accused, the
present    Social     Security   Officer   of     the    complainant
organisation     Sri.Ashok S/o.Karmbir            Singh has filed
examination in chief Affidavit and he has relied on 7
documents as per Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.7 and he is fully cross
examined. Accused statement is recorded as per Sec.313
of Cr.P.C. She has denied the same and submit that, she
is having evidence to lead.
     7.     Later, when the case is set down for defence
evidence complainant and accused have settled the case
out side the court and they have filed joint memo,
reporting their settlement, that, they have settled the case
out side the court for Rs.2,02,788/­ and accused has
agreed     to   pay    the   settled   amount       on     or      before
10/09/2022.
     8. I have heard the arguments and perused the
materials available on record.
     9.    The      following    points    that    arise     for     my
determination:
                                                  C.C.No.7219/2018


                           ­:POINTS:­
         1. Whether        the      complainant
            organization and accused have
            voluntarily settled the cheque
            amount as per the terms and
            conditions of their Joint Memo.?

         2. What Order?

      10. After carefully going through the materials
available on record and taking into consideration of facts
and circumstances of the case, my finding to the above
points are as follows:
      Point No.1     :     In the Affirmative
      Point No.2     :     As per final order,
                           for the following:
                         REASONS

      11. Point No.1: PW1 being the authorized person
of the complainant       organization, he reiterated the
complaint    averments     in   his     examination­in­chief
affidavit.

      12. when case is set down for defence evidence,
complainant and accused have voluntarily compromised
and settled the case and they have filed joint memo
reporting their settlement that, they have settled the case
for Rs.2,02,788/­ and accused has agreed to pay the
settled amount in 4 installments i.e., first installment of
Rs.52,788/­ and rest of three installments of Rs.50,000/­
                                                  C.C.No.7219/2018


each, commencing from 10/6/2022 to 10/9/2022 as
stated in the joint memo and they prays this court to
pass the judgment as per their settlement and it will have
the binding effect on them.
      13. In view of the joint memo filed by the parties, it
is evident that, accused has admitted the issuance of
cheque    to   the   complainant     organization    and    her
signature there on, Further, she has admitted the alleged
transaction with the complainant organization and her
liability towards complainant organization. In other
words accused has admitted the entire case and
documents of the complainant organization in toto.
Further, in the joint memo they have voluntarily reported
and   agreed   that,   they   have   settled   the   case   for
Rs.2,02,788/­. Accused has agreed to pay the settled
amount as stated in the joint memo i.e., on or before
10/9/2022.
      14. The aforesaid fact is consented/acknowledged
by the complainant organization. It is also true that,
complainant organization has reserved it's right, to
recover the settled amount as per law, in case if there is
any default from the accused. The said fact is also
consented by the accused.
      15. Apparently, accused has admitted the entire
case of the complainant organization and they have
reported their settlement by filing joint memo, inasmuch,
                                                C.C.No.7219/2018


there is no material on record to disbelieve the reported
settlement by the parties and it is deserved to be
accepted. In view of the joint memo filed by complainant
organization and accused, it is crystal clear that accused
has admitted his guilt as alleged by the complainant
organization. Further more, complainant organization
and accused have agreed for their own settlement and
they have taken initiative with repayment schedule for
the settled amount and they prays this court to pass the
judgment accordingly by awarding the fine amount as
compensation to the complainant organization for the
enforcement of their settlement, such being the case and
to meet the ends of justice and equity, and by considering

the admitted settlement. as reported by the parties as per
their join memo, I am answering this point in the
Affirmative.
      16.   POINT NO.2:­ For the foregoing reason and
discussion, on point No.1, I proceed to pass the following:
                       ORDER

Exercising the power conferred U/Sec.255(2) of Cr.P.C. accused is hereby convicted for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of N.I.Act­1881.

Accused is sentenced to pay the fine amount of Rs.2,02,788/­ to the complainant organization on or C.C.No.7219/2018 before 10/9/2022 as agreed in the joint memo and it is as follows:

Installment Date Amount 1 10/06/2022 Rs.52,788/- 2 10/07/2022 Rs.50,000/- 3 10/08/2022 Rs.50,000/- 4 10/09/2022 Rs.50,000/-

In default, accused shall under go simple imprisonment for a period of one year.

The entire fine amount shall be paid to the complainant organization as compensation as per section 357 of Cr.P.C.

The reported joint memo shall form part of the record.

The bail bond and surety bond of accused shall continue till she pays the agreed settled amount as per the joint memo.

Office is directed to supply the free copy of this judgment to the accused forthwith.

(Dictated to the Stenographer directly on computer, typed by him, same was corrected by me and then pronounced by me in the open court on 1st day of July 2022).

(P. SHIVARAJ) XXXVIII A.C.M.M. Bengaluru.

C.C.No.7219/2018 ANNEXURE

1) List of Witnesses Examined on behalf of the Complainant organization:

PW.1 : Sri.Ashok S/o.Karambir Singh.
2) List of exhibits marked on behalf of the Complainant organization:
Ex.P.1 : Copy of Authorization letter. Ex.P.2 : C/c of Notification dt.8/11/2021 Ex.P.3 : Original cheque. Ex.P.4 : Cheque return memo. Ex.P.5 : Notice given to accused. Ex.P.6 : Postal Acknowledgement. Ex.P.7 : Copy of Employers Registration form.
3) List of Witnesses Examined on behalf of the Accused:­ ­­NIL­­
4) List of exhibits marked on behalf of the Accused:­ ­­NIL­­ (P. SHIVARAJ) XXXVIII A.C.M.M. Bengaluru.

C.C.No.7219/2018 (Judgment pronounced in Open Court vide separate order ) ORDER Exercising the power conferred U/Sec.255(2) of Cr.P.C. accused is hereby convicted for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of N.I.Act­1881.

Accused is sentenced to pay the fine amount of Rs.2,02,788/­ to the complainant organization on or before 10/9/2022 as agreed in the joint memo and it is as follows:

Installment Date Amount 1 10/06/2022 Rs.52,788/- 2 10/07/2022 Rs.50,000/- 3 10/08/2022 Rs.50,000/- 4 10/09/2022 Rs.50,000/-

In default, accused shall under go simple imprisonment for a period of one year.

The entire fine amount shall be paid to the complainant organization as compensation as per section 357 of Cr.P.C.

The reported joint memo shall form part of the record.

C.C.No.7219/2018 The bail bond and surety bond of accused shall continue till she pays the agreed settled amount as per the joint memo.

Office is directed to supply the free copy of this judgment to the accused forthwith.

(P. SHIVARAJ) XXXVIII A.C.M.M. Bengaluru.

C.C.No.7219/2018