Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R. Sakthivel vs Palanivel on 7 July, 2025

Author: T.V.Thamilselvi

Bench: T.V.Thamilselvi

                                                                                          CMA No. 3076 of 2024



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 07-07-2025

                                                            CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                                 CMA No. 3076 of 2024



                R. Sakthivel
                S/o. Ramasamy, No.9/15-A,
                Rajaganapathy Kovil Street, Vennandur
                Post, Rasipuram Tk, Namakkal Dt.
                                                                                          Appellant(s)
                                                                 Vs
                1.PALANIVEL
                S/o. KaliyannaGounder,

                2.The Branch Manager,
                The United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
                No.5-B11, SBI Upstairs,
                Salem Road, Rasipuram TK
                Namakkal District.
                                                                    Respondent(s)
                PRAYER:Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                Vehicles Act, 1988, prays to enhance the compensation in judgment dated
                22.10.2024 in MCOP NO.97 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
                Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Rasipuram.

                                  For Appellant(s):       M/s. R. Nalliyappan, G. Sathish

                                  For Respondent(s):      M/s. D.Venkatachalam For R2
                                                          R1 - Died




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                 ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 06:14:22 pm )
                                                                                         CMA No. 3076 of 2024



                                                      JUDGEMENT

The appellant / claimant has filed this appeal to enhance the compensation in judgement dated 22.10.2024 in MCOP NO.97 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Court), Rasipuram.

2. The brief facts of the case of the appellant/claimant are as follows: On October 23, 2014, at around 4:30 PM, between Venandur and Rasipuram Main Road, near Tachangadu, the claimant was riding his TVS 50 motor-cycle bearing Registration No. TN 28 S 8916. At that time, a Maruti car bearing Registration No. TN 28 S 6413, driven by the first respondent, collided with the claimant’s vehicle in a rash and negligent manner. As a result, the appellant sustained severe injuries all over his body, including a fracture on his right shoulder. Subsequently, the appellant was taken to the Government Hospital at Rasipuram for initial treatment and was later referred to Palaniyandi Mudaliar Memorial Hospital at Salem for further treatment. A criminal case was registered against the first respondent at the Vennandur Police Station, Rasipuram Taluk, in Crime No. 332 of 2004. The first respondent is the owner- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 06:14:22 pm ) CMA No. 3076 of 2024 cum-driver of the Maruti car involved in the accident, and the second respondent is the insurer of the said vehicle, holding Policy No. 170703/31/04/00484, which was valid on the date of the accident. Hence, both the first respondent, as owner/driver, and the second respondent, as the insurer, are vicariously and statutorily liable to pay compensation.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant/claimant submitted that the Tribunal failed to properly consider the multiple injuries sustained by the claimant and erroneously fixed a meagre amount of only Rs.5,000/- as compensation, which may modified.

4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent / Insurance Company contended that the appellant / claimant sustained only simple injuries in the said accident and that the Tribunal rightly fixed the compensation at Rs.5,000/-, considering the fact that the accident occurred in the year 2014.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 06:14:22 pm ) CMA No. 3076 of 2024

5. On consideration of the submissions made by both sides and on a perusal of the Wound Certificate marked as Ex.P3, it is revealed that the appellant sustained multiple injuries, though not grievous in nature. Therefore, the Tribunal rightly treated the injuries as simple in nature. However, considering the fact that the appellant was admitted and discharged within two days, this Court is inclined to award a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards pain and suffering. This is in addition to the amount already awarded by the Tribunal. Therefore, the total compensation is Rs.5,000 + Rs.5,000 = Rs.10,000/-.

6. It is further noted that the driving licence of the first respondent had expired at the time of the accident. Hence, the Tribunal fixed the entire liability on the owner of the vehicle. However, this Court is of the opinion that the said liability fastened solely on the owner requires modification. On the date of the accident, the vehicle was insured with the second respondent, United India Insurance Company Limited. Accordingly, the second respondent / Insurance Company is directed to pay the compensation amount to the claimant, with liberty to recover the said amount from the first respondent under the principle of "pay and recovery."

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 06:14:22 pm ) CMA No. 3076 of 2024

7. The second respondent / United India Insurance Company Limited is directed to deposit the compensation amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date of the claim petition till the date of deposit, to the credit of M.C.O.P. No.97 of 2008, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge, Rasipuram, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt or uploading of a copy of this order. Upon such deposit, the Insurance Company shall recover the same from the owner of the vehicle (first respondent) under the same cause of action.

(i) On such deposit being made by the 2nd respondent, the appellant / claimant is at liberty to withdraw the same in the manner know to law.
(ii) The appellant/claimant is not entitled to claim any interest for the delay, if any, in filing this appeal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 06:14:22 pm ) CMA No. 3076 of 2024

8. In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

07-07-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rri To

1.Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Rasipuram.

2.The Branch Manager The United Insurance Co. Ltd, No.5- B11, SBI Upstairs, Salem Road, Rasipuram Tk, Namakkal Dt.

3.The Section Officer, VR section, High Court of Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 06:14:22 pm ) CMA No. 3076 of 2024 T.V.THAMILSELVI J.

rri CMA No. 3076 of 2024 07-07-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 06:14:22 pm )