Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Gnanananda Ashramam And Ramananda ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 July, 2022

Author: B Krishna Mohan

Bench: B Krishna Mohan

3233 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI~~
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) ~
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY,,.
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO.
. -PRESENT: '
THE HONQURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN:
WRIT PETITION NO: 30447 OF 2024 =~

Behvean: ae
Gnanananda Ashrarnam and Ramanands Ashrama Sadhu Matt, Rep : o
preskient Matha Mounananda Saraswathi @ Doddi. Padmaari, aged about 42
years, Rio Gnanananda Ashramam and Ramananda Astrama Sadhu Mutt, 58-1.
28/47 GNR, Venkaillpalern Junction, Visakhapsinarn ~ SQ0022, State of AP

a. Patiioner
AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Reo. by is Pri Secretary, Municipal Adrfinistration:
and Urban Development, Searstariat build! ings, Velaganuch, Amaravall, Guntur
Dist
é. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rap by its Fri. Secretary, (Endowments Department,
Secretariat Buldings, Velagaouci, Amaravati
areal ar Vsaknepainam Mun me Go orporation, ae ene by fs The

Fhe commissioner Endown Wants Department Vi jayawada,

Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Deparment, Visakhapatnam,

Assistant ComMissionar, Endowments Departriant, Visakhapatnam.

SHO, MVP Police Static oh, MLV.P colony, Visakhapatnam.

DG af rahe Mc manana...

Vamel Krishia, MLO Silo Not known aged ahout 50 years, Rio Sivalipalam,

Visakhagainam |

1G. Apparl Sri Vidiya, Corporate, vo Gin aged about 45 years, R/o Simhadriouram,
Visakhapatnam

Ji. Mutlamsefiy Sanivasarac, Sio not knawn R/o Near Venkateswara Swamy
terme, Sasthammadhara, Visakhapatnam.

WSO , Ananda apUraMm PLS Visakhapatnam.

"EO be

co

we Respondents

Peition under Aricie 2268 of the Consiftulian of India praying that in the
crcumsianoss stated in the affidavit filed therawith, the High Court may be pleasad
pleased to iIssud an appropiate Wri, Order or Direction more parti icularly In the nature
of Wat of Mandamus declaring the threatened and imminent action of the Respancdenis
3 ip 12. pariicuiany that of respondents 5 fo 11, their associates and followers in
interfering with the managernant of Gfosala by fhe Pestadhipathi of Gnanananda
Ashramam and Ramanandsa Ashrama Sadhu Mutt comprising of about Ao.3. AG oants in
which about 430 cows and calves are being reared, looked afler and provided with
water, fodder, husk, green grass and dry grass sifuated in Sy. No-TS/1 and 18/2
aiuaied at Venkafipaiemn, Visakhapatnam 3s Hegal, unauthorized, arbitrary and viciative
of Anicles 18 and 21 of Constitution of India and direct the reapondanis 3 to TZ not to
enter the Gosala of about Aco. oants in Sy. No-~ TQM and 1972 af Vernkoalipaiem
comprising of § large sheds and yvanani space in and ground tham managed by
Pastadhipath! of Gnanananda Ashramam and Ramananda Ashrama Sadhu Mut.

i& NO: 1 OF 20249

Pattion under Section 157 CPC graying thet is the ckcurmstances stated in the
affidavit fled In support of the petition, ihe High C Our may be pleased to direct the
reapondaents 3 to 12 not fo enter the Gosala of aboul Ac.3.00 cants in Sy. No- 19/1 and
19/2 of Vankolinalern comprising of 5 large sheds and vacant space in and around them
managed by Peetach ipathi of Gnanananda Ashramam and Rameananda Ashrama
Sadhu Mutt, Pending digpusal of WP anda? of 2021, on the file of the High Court.



The pebtion caming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit
fled in support thereof and order of the High Court dated 22. 12. 2027, 84-122081,
24.03.2022 | 29.04.2028 & O8.07 2022 and upon hearing the arqgumenis of Sri M
CHALAPAT! RAO Advocate for the Patilioner and of GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN
URBAN DEV for the Respondent Not and GP for Endawment for Respondent Nos.2, 4
fo 6 and Si M. Laxm! Nerayana Reddy for the resporident Nos. 3, 9 and 70 and GP for
Revenue for Respondent Nos. 7, 8 and 72 and the Court made the following.

ORDER:

* Neard the counsel for the petitioner. it appears that the respondent Nos. 4&5 Med the counter affidavits. The standing counes! for the respondent Nod seeks time for filing the counter Se .

Liston 17.08.2022.

The interim order granted earlier by this court dated 24.032022 is extended until further orders. <-- in the meantime, the other respandents shall Mle their counters." - Safi Prabhakar Rigen ASSISTANT REGIST FYRUE COPY) RAR SECTION OFFICER POR Ta, One CC to Sri. M Chalanati Mac Advacate [OPUCT <. Two COs fo GP for Municipal Adminstration Urban Development High Court OF Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] ~ Two OCs to GP for Emiowments, High Court OF Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] One CC io Sri M. Laxmf Narayane Reddy, Advocate (OPUC] One spare copy BN ws Bo nby $e YGH COURT BRM DATED 2B/O7 2032 NOTE: List on THOR. 2089 ORDER ey -- WP.No. 30447 of 2634 INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED |