Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Allahabad High Court

Rakesh Patel And Another vs Union Of India And 3 Others on 20 August, 2019

Author: Suneet Kumar

Bench: Suneet Kumar





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 2
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 55328 of 2017
 

 
Petitioner :- Rakesh Patel And Another
 
Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Durga Tiwari
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,Mohd Shere Ali,Rakesh Kumar Pandey
 

 
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
 

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Sabhajeet Singh, learned counsel for the first respondent and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

Petitioners are working as Instructor, Art Education and Physical Education in Upper Primary School, Girahiya Nichaul, District Maharajganj and Uppar Primary School, Dashwarpur, Block Adhouli, District Bhadohi.

By the instant writ petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs:

"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent nos.2 and 3 to pay honorarium Rs.17,000/- approved by the Project Approval Board in the Minutes of the 254th P.A.B. meeting held on 27 March 2017, month to month regularly.
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent nos.2 and 3 to pay the arrears of enhanced honorarium to the petitioners from the month of March 2017 to till date."

It is urged by the learned counsel for the parties that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition on facts and law has been considered and decided by the learned Single Judge in Anurag and another Vs. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development and others on 3 July 2019 (Service Single No.7631 of 2018 and connected matters). The operative portion of the order reads thus:

"24. A writ in the nature of mandamus is issued directing the opposite party Nos.2 and 4 i.e. the Chief Secretary, Government of U.P., Lucknow and the State Project Direction (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), U.P., Lucknow to pay the arrears of enhanced honorarium at the rate of Rs.17000/- per month to the petitioners with effect from the month of March, 2017 till date.
25. Despite the decision that has been taken by the Executive Committee reducing the amount of honorarium from Rs.17000/- per month to Rs.9800/- per month vide order dated 21.12.2017 and 02.01.2018, however the same has now been quashed, but the petitioners have not even been paid the honorarium at the rate of Rs.9800/- per month till date, as they were being paid the honorarium at the rate of Rs.8470/- per month, therefore, this Court treating the aforesaid inaction on the part of the opposite parties as harassment of the petitioners, the petitioners are allowed interest @ 9% per annum on the arrears of enhanced honorarium, as directed above.
26. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are allowed."

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of judgment and order rendered in Anurag (supra).

No cost.

Order Date :- 20.8.2019 Atul