Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Bombay High Court

Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs M-Suresh Exports Pvt Ltd(Formerly ... on 4 December, 2018

Bench: Akil Kureshi, M.S. Sanklecha

                                                                                    2. os itxa 1675-16 228-17.doc

R.M. AMBERKAR
 (Private Secretary)
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                               O.O.C.J.

                                 INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1675 OF 2016

                       Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 10 .. Appellant
                             Vs
                       Intraocular Care Pvt Ltd            .. Respondent
                                                 WITH
                              INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 228 OF 2017

                       Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 10             .. Appellant
                             Vs
                       M-Suresh Exports Pvt Ltd                        .. Respondent
                                                   ...................
                        Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant
                        Mr. Mayank Thosar i/by B.V. Jhaveri for the Respondents
                                                            ...................

                                                    CORAM        : AKIL KURESHI &
                                                                     M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
                                                     DATE       :    DECEMBER 4, 2018.

                       P.C.:

1. These appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) have been filed challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

2. Mr. Arvind Pinto, the learned counsel appearing in support of the appeals, states that he has been instructed to withdraw these appeals. This is for the reason that the tax effect involved in these appeals is less than the threshold limit of Rs. 50 Lacs as provided in CBDT Circular No. 3 of 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 06/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 28/12/2018 23:56:22 :::

2. os itxa 1675-16 228-17.doc 2018 dated 11.7.2018.

3. In view of the above submission, the appeals are dismissed as not pressed.

4. Refund of court fees as per rules.

[ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ] 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 06/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 28/12/2018 23:56:22 :::