Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

In Re: Sri Dhritiman Sarkar vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 7 January, 2020

Author: Tapabrata Chakraborty

Bench: Tapabrata Chakraborty

                                                        1

07.01.2020
 Item No.34
 Court No.15
 Avijit Mitra
    ML

                       W.P. No. 21370 (W) of 2019

                In re: Sri Dhritiman Sarkar
                             - Versus -
                       The State of West Bengal & Ors.


                Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta,
                Mr. Niladri Saha,
                Ms. Snuti Lahiri
                                    For the Petitioner
                Mr. Swapan Kumar Datta, Sr. Adv.,
                Mr. Tapas Kumar Mondal
                                    For the State
                Mr. Pulak Ranjan Mandal,
                Ms. Bandana Das,
                Mr. Subhrangsu Panda
                                    For the Commission


                       Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner be kept on record.

                       Ms. Saha Dutta, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that

                responding to an advertisement dated 16th July, 2018 published by the West Bengal

                College Service Commission (in short, the said Commission), the petitioner applied

                for the post of Assistant Professor in mathematics. He was called for the interview

                but he was not given any marks for research publication though in terms of UGC

                Regulations, which is binding upon the Commission, she was entitled to two (2)

                marks for each research publications published in Peer-Reviewed or UGC-listed

                Journals. The fact that the UGC Regulations of 2018 provide for grant of such marks

                would be explicit for the answer given to the petitioner's query made under the

                provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005. In support of such contention she

                has drawn the attention of this Court to the annexures at pages 130-133 of the writ

                petition.
                                        2

       Per contra, Mr. Mandal, learned advocate appearing for the said Commission

submits that the UGC Regulations of 2018 were notified on 18th July, 2018 after the

advertisement dated 16th July, 2018 and as such the same have no manner of

application in the present case.

       Upon hearing the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and

upon considering the materials on record, I am of the opinion that the matter needs

to be decided upon exchange of affidavits.

       Accordingly, the respondents are directed to file their affidavit-in-opposition

within four weeks. Reply thereto, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.

The parties would be at liberty to mention the matter for final hearing after expiry of the period as fixed above towards exchange of affidavits.

(Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)