Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 8]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Rajiv Setia & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 January, 2022

Author: Jyoti Singh

Bench: Chief Justice, Jyoti Singh

                          $~40
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +      W.P.(C) 223/2022
                                 RAJIV SETIA & ANR.                              ..... Petitioners
                                                Through:       Mr. Pranay Trivedi, Advocate.
                                                    versus
                                 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                            ..... Respondents
                                               Through:        Mr. Chetan Sharma, Additional
                                                               Solicitor General with Mr. Kirtiman
                                                               Singh, Central Government Standing
                                                               Counsel for UOI.
                                                               Mr. Jatin Punia, Government Pleader.
                                                               Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq, Standing Counsel
                                                               along with Mr. Ramesh Shan and
                                                               Ms. Sabika Ahmad, Advocates for
                                                               R-3.
                                                               Ms. Manisha Chauhan and Mr. Zahid,
                                                               Advocates for R-4.

                                 CORAM:
                                 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                 HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
                                         ORDER

% 06.01.2022 Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing. W.P.(C) 223/2022 & CM APPL. 615/2022 (Stay) Issue notice.

Mr. Kirtiman Singh, learned Central Government Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondents No. 1 and 2.

Ms. Sabika Ahmad, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 3.

W.P.(C) 223/2022 Page 1 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Date:17.01.2022 18:26:52

Ms. Manisha Chauhan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 4.

Learned counsels seek time to file counter affidavits. Time as prayed for is granted.

Let counter affidavits be filed, before the next date of hearing. Petitioners claim to be tenants of the various properties of the Wakf Board, as detailed in the writ petition. Challenge is laid in the writ petition to certain provisions of the Wakf Amendment Act, 2013 and Wakf Properties Lease Rules, 2014.

At the outset, it is pointed out by learned counsel for the Petitioners that several writ petitions seeking similar reliefs are pending in this Court wherein notice has been issued and interim orders have been granted in favour of the Petitioners therein staying the Auction Notices as well as restraining the Respondents from taking coercive steps against the Petitioners. It is thus submitted that similar reliefs be granted to the Petitioners herein, during the pendency of the present petition.

We have heard learned counsels for the parties and looked into the facts and circumstances of the case. We have also perused the orders passed by this Court in several writ petitions, one of them being W.P.(C) 9348/2019, which was heard with a batch of petitions and a common order was passed granting interim protection to the Petitioners therein. We also find that the Court has, while granting interim protection, directed the Petitioners to pay rent at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month or double the last paid rent, whichever is higher, without prejudice to the rights W.P.(C) 223/2022 Page 2 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Date:17.01.2022 18:26:52 and contentions of the parties. Learned counsels for the Respondents do not dispute this position.

In view of the aforesaid, we hereby stay the operation of the Auction Notices issued by Delhi Wakf Board, which are subject matter of the above writ petitions, as detailed therein and further direct that no coercive steps shall be taken against the Petitioners. The interim order passed today shall operate, till the next date of hearing.

In the meantime, Petitioners shall pay rent @ Rs.5,000/- per month or double the last paid rent, whichever is higher, without prejudice to their rights and contentions.

We make it clear that question regarding the payment of rent or damages for use and occupation including the question regarding the rate under the provisions of the Wakf Act shall be considered when the matters are taken up for hearing.

List on 29.03.2022 along with W.P.(C) Nos. 14617/2021, 14620/2021, 14621/2021 and other similar petitions.

CHIEF JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH, J JANUARY 06, 2022/sn W.P.(C) 223/2022 Page 3 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Date:17.01.2022 18:26:52