Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 16, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

3222/2011 on 15 July, 2011

Author: Kalidas Mukherjee

Bench: Kalidas Mukherjee

                                                                          1

1




                            CRM 3222 of 2011




       In re: Madhu Sudan Kunar & Ors. - Petitioners


       Mr. S. Sanyal
       Mr. Sujan Chatterjee          -For the petitioners

       Mr. S.A. Ahmed            - For the State


    Re: Application under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed
    on 7.4.11 in connection with Jangipara P.S. Case No. 23/10 dated 14.2.10
    under sections 147/148/149/ 323/324/325/326/307/353/332/333 I.P.C.,
    sections 25/27 of the Arms Act and section 9b(ii) of the Indian Explosives
    Act and section 9 of the Maintenance of Public Order.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner Nos 4 and 10 namely Sk. Golam Nabi and Asta Panja do not want to press the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner Nos. 4 and 10 is rejected as not pressed.

We have perused the materials available before us and we are of the considered view that this is an appropriate case for admitting the petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 with an order under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 be released on bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the following conditions that: 2

(i) the petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Agency of the case as and when required;
(ii) no direct or indirect threat or any inducement would be made to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
(iii) the petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court;

This application is, thus disposed of.

(Kalidas Mukherjee, J) (Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J.)