Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 16, Cited by 0]

Manipur High Court

Shri Bhadresh Kr. Patel vs The Union Of India Represented By The ... on 13 December, 2024

KHOIROM Digitally  signed by
          KHOIROM
BIPINCHAN Date: 2024.12.13SINGH
          BIPINCHANDRA
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                                            AT IMPHAL
DRA SINGH 16:56:12 +05'30'

                                  BAIL APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2024


                         Shri Bhadresh Kr. Patel, aged about 51 years, s/o
                         Subhashbhai Patel, R/o, 3-147 Patelfaliyua, Avakhal
                         - 2, Vadodara, Gujarat - 391250.


                                                                            .... Petitioner


                                                - Versus -


                      The Union of India represented by the Narcotics Control
                      Bureau (NCB), through its Intelligence Officer, Narcotics
                      Control Bureau (NCB), CPWD Quarters, Changangei
                      Kongba Uchekon, Imphal West, Manipur - 795008.


                                                                          .... Respondent




                                         BEFORE
                         HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU


                For the petitioner    :      Mr. T. Momo, Senior Advocate assisted by
                                             Mr. Ph. Niranjoy, Advocate
                For the respondent :         Mr. W. Darakishwor, Senior Advocate
                Date of hearing       :      18.10.2024
                Date of judgment &
                order                 :      13.12.2024




                Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                        Page 1
                          JUDGMENT & ORDER
                              (CAV)

[1]            Heard Mr. T. Momo, learned senior counsel assisted by

Mr. Ph. Niranjoy, Advocate appearing for the petitioner and Mr. W.

Darakishwor, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent.

[2]            The present application has been filed under Section

439 of the Cr.P.C. 1973 read with Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs &

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with the following prayer:

               (i)     To    pass   an   order    for   enlarging     the

                       petitioner/accused person on bail in connection

                       with the Special Trial Case No. 26 of 2023 with

                       reference to NCB Crime No. 02/NCB/Imp/2024

                       dated 03.03.2024 U/S 8(c) & 9A r/w S.21(c),

                       25A, 25 & 29 of the ND & PS Act, 1985, which is

                       pending before the Ld. Special Court (ND & PS),

                       Manipur.

               (ii)    To pass any further order or any appropriate

                       order/direction in the facts and circumstances of

                       the case.

[3]            Brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner,

who is a father of 1(one) child and also taking care of his wife and

ailing mother aged about 77 years, is sole proprietor of M/s Recover

Healthcare Ltd. which is in operation since 2002 dealing in

pharmaceutical products and a resident of Vadodara Gujarat.




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                          Page 2
 [4]            The petitioner was arrested on 10.05.2023 by NCB

officer and formally arrest memo thereof was also issued to him.

Since then, he has been in judicial custody till date. On 03.07.2023,

in connection with the NCB Crime No. 02/NCB/Imp/2023 dt. 03-03-

2023 U/S 8(c) & 9A r/w S.21(c), 25A, 25 & 29 of the ND & PS Act,

1985, the I.O. of the case had submitted charge sheet before the

Special Judge (ND & PS), Imphal West, Manipur.

               In the charge sheet, it has been alleged that the

petitioner supplied 1500 (one thousand and five hundred) packets of

Pseudoephedrine tablets; out of which, 533 (five hundred and thirty

three) packets were seized by the NCB team on 03.03.2023 from the

premises of Jangminthang Guite. He        supplied the said tablets to

other accused namely, Abdul Wakil without any valid drug license

using fake authorization of Elite Medical Store, Aizawl, Mizoram in the

name of drug "Cetrizine HCL 10 mg (Levocet)"; for which, the

petitioner received a sum of Rs. 11.68 lakhs in his account at Bank of

Baroda. In connivance with other accused namely, Harshal Desai,

Director of Ardro Drugs Pvt. Ltd., Tapi, Gujarat, the petitioner

received a consignment of the said tablets in the brand name of

"Phifed" tablets and the bill was generated in the name of "Admos

SR" upon instructions of the said Abdul Wakil.

               It was also alleged that during search of the office-cum-

godown of the petitioner on 09.05.2023, well prepared fake labels of

"Cetrizine HCL 10 mg" tablets manufactured by the Sunview Biotech



Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                       Page 3
 were recovered which were similar in nature found affixed onto the

seized 533 packets of Pseudoephidrine tablets by the NCB team on

03.03.2023 and the search-cum-seizure list was prepared on the

same day.

[5]            The petitioner filed a case being Special Trial Case No.

26 of 2023 before the Special Judge (ND & PS), Imphal West,

Manipur at Lamphelpat. While pending the case for charge hearing

before the Court, since the petitioner had health issues/problems, he

had filed a bail application being Cril. Misc(B) Case No. 209 of 2023

(Ref. : S.T. Case No. 26 of 2023) before the same Court for releasing

on bail on medical ground. However, vide order dated 12.09.2023

(Annexure - A/3), the said bail application was rejected. The

operative portions of the order are extracted hereunder:

               "10.   Perused materials on record including the Search cum
                      Seizure list, statement of witness so far recorded, etc.
                      At this stage, there exists no such facts and
                      circumstances on record that are sufficient in
                      themselves to justify satisfaction that the accused is
                      not guilty of the alleged offences or no reasonable
                      grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty of the
                      said offences. There is also nothing to show that the
                      accused is not likely to commit any similar offence
                      while on bail.

               11.    In view of the above said health status report of the
                      accused, having regard to the relevant considerations
                      including seriousness of the alleged offences and the
                      stage of the case being at charge hearing, I am not
                      inclined to release the accused on bail.

               12.    Therefore, the application is rejected and stands
                      disposed of."




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                             Page 4
 [6]            Since the petitioner had continued to suffer from

multiple health issues/problems and the jail authority was unable to

provide proper medical attention to him, he had filed another bail

application being Cril. Misc.(B) Case No. 261 of 2023 (Ref.: S.T. Case

No. 26 of 2023) before the Ld. Special Judge (ND & PS), Manipur at

Lamphelpat praying for releasing him on bail(Annexure - A/4).

[7]            Further, he had filed a case being Cril. Misc. Case No.

154 of 2023 (Ref.: Cril. Misc. (B) Case No. 261 of 2023 in S.T. Case

No. 26 of 2023) before the same Court with the prayer for releasing

him on bail pending trial of referred case, coupled with prayer for

calling medical report from the Superintendent, Manipur Central Jail,

Sajiwa(Annexure - A/5). Vide order dated 17.11.2023 (Annexure -

A/6),the Ld. Special Judge (ND & PS) passed the following order:

                        "As above, the S.P. Jail, Sajiwa is directed to get the
               accused/petitioner medically examined and submit the health
               status report on 22-11-2023.
                        Fix 22-11-2023 for report and hearing.
                        Send a copy of this order to the S.P., Manipur Central
               Jail, Sajiwa.
                        Petitioner is to take steps."

               As per the order dated 17.11.2023, the medical report

dated 22.11.2023 was filed before the Ld. Special Judge (ND & PS),

Manipur at Lamphelpat(Annexure - A/7).

[8]            Vide order dated 07.12.2023 (Annexure - A/8), the Ld.

Special Judge (ND & PS), Manipur praying for releasing on bail

rejected the bail application being Cril. Misc.(B) Case No. 261 of 2023




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                              Page 5
 (Ref.: S.T. Case No. 26 of 2023). The operative portions of the said

order are extracted as follows:

               "8.    On perusal of the materials on record, at this stage,
                     there exists no such facts and circumstances on record
                     that are sufficient in themselves to justify satisfaction
                     that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offences
                     or no reasonable grounds to believe that the accused
                     is not guilty of the said offences. There is also nothing
                     to show that the accused is not likely to commit any
                     similar offence while on bail.
               9.    In view of the above statement of said Dr. M. Amarjit
                     Singh, Medical Officer of MCJ, Sajiwa in c/w the health
                     status report of the accused, having regard to all the
                     relevant considerations including seriousness of the
                     alleged offences and the stage of the case, I am not
                     inclined to release the accused on bail.
               10.   The SP, Manipur Central Jail, Sajiwa is hereby
                     informed to provide all the necessary and proper
                     medical facilities (including MRI, Colonoscopy and
                     Endoscopy) to the accused at the earliest and submit
                     a report in this regard on or before 15/12/2023.
               11.   Therefore, the application for bail is rejected and
                     stands disposed of.
               12.   Copy of this order be sent to the S.P., Manipur Central
                     Jail Sajiwa for information and necessary steps."

               As per the order dated 07.12.2023, the S.P., Manipur

Central Jail Sajiwa wrote a letter dated 14.12.2023 to the Ld. Special

Judge (ND & PS), Manipur mentioning that the medical report could

not be submitted timely since the medical investigation report done

in JNIMS have not been received by his office and therefore,

requested to submit the same on another date after receiving the

report from the JNIMS.

[9]            However, the medical report has not been given to the

petitioner and no report has also been submitted before the Ld.

Special Judge (ND & PS), Manipur till date by the S.P., Manipur



Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                             Page 6
 Central Jail, Sajiwa. Accordingly, the present bail application has been

filed under the following grounds:

               (i)     The petitioner is under trial prisoner and his

               detention in jail for an indefinite period violates Article

               21 of the Constitution of India. Every person detained

               or arrested in jail is entitled to get speedy trial. It is

               settled law that bail is the rule and jail an exception and

               that the refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal

               liberty of the individual guaranteed under Article 21 of

               the Constitution of India.

               (ii)    Detention of the petitioner in jail will not serve

               any useful purpose as the investigating authority

               already submitted the charge sheet before the Ld.

               Special Judge (ND & PS), Manipur at Lamphelpat after

               completion of the investigation and no charge has been

               framed against the petitioner till date and the

               proceedings of the present trial case has been

               adjourned without framing of charges.

               (iii)   There is no prima facie case against the

               petitioner from the evidence and the documents

               produced by the prosecution.

               (iv)    Nothing incriminating or contraband has ever

               been found from the premises of the petitioner. The

               allegation in the charge sheet against the petitioner is



Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                         Page 7
                that during the search of the office-cum-godown of the

               petitioner on 09.05.2023, the fake labels of "Citrazine

               HCL 10 mg tablet" manufactured by the Sunview

               Biotech was recovered which were similar in nature

               found      affixed   onto   the    seized    533   packets   of

               Pseudoephidrine       tablets     by   the   NCB    team     on

               03.03.2023. The said materials found and seized from

               the house premises of Jangminthang Guite who is a

               resident of Moreh, Manipur, which has no any nexus

               with the petitioner, who is a resident of Gujarat.

               (v)       The petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged

               offence in connection with the charge sheet of the Sp.

               Trial (NDPS) Case No. 26 of 2023 and since the arrest

               till date, the petitioner has been cooperating with the

               I.O. of the case.

               (vi)      Since the material seized is neither narcotic drug

               nor psychotropic substance, the classification of small

               quantity, moderate quantity and commercial quantity

               etc. would not be applicable to the present case.

               (vii)     The petitioner has many health issues/problems

               and furthermore, he is the sole bread earner of his

               family.




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                             Page 8
                (viii)   Even though the Ld. Special Judge (ND & PS),

               Manipur vide order dated 07.12.2023 directed the S.P.,

               Manipur Central Jail Sajiwa to provide the necessary

               and proper medical facilities to the petitioner and

               submit a medical report in that regard on or before

               15.12.2023, no report has been submitted by the S.P.,

               Manipur Central Jail Sajiwa till date.

               (ix)     The Ld. Special Judge (ND & PS), Manipur, vide

               its order dated 07.12.2023, has not given any cogent

               reasons for rejecting the bail application of the

               petitioner. The said order is cryptic and is devoid of any

               reasons for rejecting the bail application.

[10]           Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

respondent wherein grounds for rejection of the bail application have

been mentioned as follows:

              i)        The accused Md. Abdul Wakil came in contact
              with Bhadresh Patel through his staff Anil Nayaka
              through B2B business platform that is Tradeindia and
              made      a    deal   ofpurchasing   15   lakh   tablets   of
              Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride in the month of January
              2023. On 19.01.2023 Bhadresh Kumar Patel received a
              consignment of 15 lakh tablets (without label) in the
              billing of Admos SR from M/s Ardor Drugs Pvt. Ltd which
              is a manufacturer located at Vankhel, Songadh Ukai
              road, Songadh, Gujarat by carrying one tempo driven by
              Vipul Batt. Thereafter Bhadresh Patel directed Nitin Kr.
              Panchal to receive the consignment on 19.01.2023 at


Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                          Page 9
               M/s Recover Healthcare godown in assistance with Anil
              Bhai Nayaka and also instructed them to put the labeling
              of    Citrizine   HCI   (Levocet)   tablets   which   actually
              contained Pseudoephedrine tablets on each of the 1500
              packets of loosed tablets in plastic packets for further
              dispatched to Abdul Wakil.
              ii)      On the demand of Abdul Wakil, Bhadresh Kumar
              has given 1500 packets of Pseudoephedrine tablets
              weighing more than 300 kg of Pseudoephedrine tablets
              in 26 cartoon boxes on 31.01.2023 which was booked in
              Giri Cargo on Sanand road. Ahmedabad on 31.01.2023.
              By showing them fake label of Triprolidine HCI tablets
              (Colzen) as per plan and get it affixed on the
              consignment of Pseudoephedrine tablets. However when
              Abdul Wakil hinted Bhadresh Patel that it would be
              difficult to transport the tablets in the name of
              Pseudoephedrine tablets and as per suggestion of Abdul
              Wakil, Bhadresh Patel arranged labels of such drugs
              which do not contain Pseudoephedrine salt. Hence
              Bradhesh Kumar Patel arranged from one Kalpan Modi
              who runs a shop in the name of Intergraph at Sola
              Bhuyang Dev. Ahmadabad to design labels of Cetrizine
              Hydrochloride tablets 10 mg (Levocet) and later on
              affixed on all the 1500 packets of Pseudoephedrine
              tablets by two of M/s Recover Healthcare employees
              namely Nitin Kr. Panchal and Anil Nayaka in the godown
              of M/s Recover Healthcare own by Bhadresh Patel.
              Further Abdul Wakil made a payment of Rs 11.68 lakh to
              Bhadresh Patel's bank account no. 03320100399 of
              Kalupur Commercial Co-op Bank Ltd. in between
              27.01.2023 to 02.02.2023.




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                          Page 10
               iii)      Bhadresh Kumar Patel revealed that M/S Recover
              Healthcare has received 1500 packets of Phifed tablets
              which delivered by M/s Ardor Drugs Pvt. Ltd on the
              billing   of    Admos   SR    on      19.01.2023      that       was
              manufactured by M/s Ardor Drugs Pvt. Ltd. owned by
              the    accused    Harshal    Desai     who    is     working       in
              consultation with the accused Mehul Desai in supplying
              the    seized    Pseudoephedrine      and    Tramadol        based
              pharmaceuticals tablets under different brand names
              such as Phifed, Asifed, Admos SR ete and sold out more
              than 1 crore Phifed tablets containing Pseudoephedrine
              salt to M/S Recover Health care.
              iv)       Bhadresh   Patel   has      also   admitted       in    his
              statement that Harshal Desai used to generate Tax
              Invoices in the name of M/s Recover Healthcare but the
              products mentioned in the Tax Invoices used to be
              supplied to some other parties. Sometimes Harshal
              Desai used to generate false bills with the name of some
              other products for supply of Pseudoephedrine based
              tablets    to    Bhadresh     Patel     to    sell    the        said
              Pseudoephedrine tablets. For the said purpose Harshal
              Desai paid Rs. 10 lakh (i.e. @ Rs. I for 10 tabs of
              pseudoephedrine) as commission to Bhadresh Patel,
              which is reflected in the bank account statement of
              Kalupur Commercial Co-operative Bank of M/s Recover
              Healthcare own by Bhadresh Patel. Since Ardor Drugs
              Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturing company hence Rs 10 lakh
              might have been credited to company's bank account
              but here amount has been paid from the company's
              bank account to M/s Recover Healthcare bank account
              which is something not generally practice. Further
              Bhadresh Patel and Harshal Desai also admitted the fact


Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                             Page 11
               that said Rs 10 lakh was commission paid to Bhadresh
              Patel for generating fake bills/invoices in the name of
              M/s Recover Healthcare. Here also in the present bail
              petition, nothing proper justification has been given by
              the petitioner.
              v)      The accused Abdul Wakil also corroborated in his
              statement that he procured the consignment of 1500
              packets of Pseudoephedrine tablets from M/s Recovery
              Healthcare Ahmedabad through accused Bradesh Kumar
              Patel in association with his other two staffs/employee of
              M/S Recover Health Care namely Nitin Kr. Panchal and
              Anil Bhai Nayaka.
              vi)     During investigation, CDRs of mobile number of
              Bhadresh Patel/Abdul Wakil, Bhadresh Patel Anil Nayaka
              and Bhadresh Patel/Harshal Desai were also analyzed
              which clearly indicates that they were in regular touch
              during the process of delivery of the consignment of
              Pseudoephedrine tablets. (Copy of CDR analysis of
              Bhadresh Patel has already been submitted at Final
              Complaint dated 03.07.2023 of pages no. 363 and
              additional/supplementary complaint dated 03.10.2023.
              vii)    During the search of the office/godown premises
              of M/s Recover Healthcare in Ahmedabad, fake labels of
              Levocet Cetrizine Hydrochloride 10 mg was recovered
              and seized also. It is pertinent to mention that same
              labels were also found on the seized 533 packets of
              Pseudoephedrine tablets which clearly establish the
              linkage of seized tablets with Bhadresh Patel and his
              firm Recover Healthcare, Ahmedabad.
              viii)   During investigation it was also found that, it
              was Bhadresh Patel who made the arrangement of stay
              of Abdul Wakil when he reached to Ahmedabad in


Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                      Page 12
               January 2023 for the deal of Pseudoephedrine tablets.
              All these facts have been corroborated in the statements
              of his two of the staff Nitin Panchal and Anil Nayaka who
              were also found indulged in the present crime along with
              Bhadresh Patel.
              ix)     There is adequate piece of evidence available
              with the prosecution which indicates the key role of
              accused. There are still various facts which are to be
              corroborated to ascertain the further linkage or the
              source of the seized 110.5 kg of Pseudoephedrine
              tablets, which will not be possible if the accused is
              granted bail at this juncture.
              x)      The     forensic    examination        report      no.
              CFSL(KR)/627/NAR/32/23           dated    26.10.2023       was
              received from Guwahati which gave positive test or
              result as given: Diacetyl morphine (heroine), Morphine-
              3-acetate, 6- Monoacetylmorphine and Acetylcodein
              have been detected in Exhibit-A and Pseudoephedrine
              has been detected in Exhibit-B. (The chemical test report
              has already been submitted in separate supplementary
              petition dated 09.11.2023 through SPP, NCB). The
              chemical test report has proven and completed the
              prosecution justification that all the accused are involved
              in illegal trade/business which also clearly indicates the
              huge    conspiracy   made    on     the   diversion   of   the
              Pseudoephedrine tablets meant for trafficking and
              manufacturing of Methamphetamine (ATS), a banned
              drug.
              xi      Further proclamation issued against wanted
              suspect namely, Ms. Sultani, Sh. Jaminthang Guite and
              Ms. Hawlemneng Guite u/s 82 of the NDPS has been
              published/flashed in local newspaper on 14.04.2024 and


Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                            Page 13
               15.04.2024 and accordingly the Special NDPS court,
              Lamphel is taking up action in continuing with the trail
              and proceeding of the case.
              xii)     The accused, in the present case, Harshal Desai
              and Mehul Desai has been issued Detention Order under
              PITNDPS Act by the Joint Secretary. Ministry of Finance
              on dated 28.02.2024 and copy of the same served on
              29.02.2024 and 01.03.2024 for engaging in illicit
              trafficking of narcotics drugs & psychotropic substance
              and confirmation order is awaited from the advisory
              board.

[11]           The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that rejoinder affidavit has been filed stating that the

allegations made in the final complaint (charge sheet) dated

03.07.2023 submitted before the Ld. Special Judge (NDPS) Court,

Manipur in Special Trial Case No. 26 of 2023 are yet to be proved

and the same is at the stage for charge hearing, which is pending

before the Ld. Special Judge (NDPS) Court, Manipur.

[12]           Further, the learned senior counsel appearing for the

petitioner submits that there is no prima facie or reasonable ground

to believe that the accused had committed an offence from the

evidence and the documents produced by the prosecution. The

petitioner/accused     person   was   arrested   on   10-05-2023   and

thereafter,accused/petitioner was remanded into judicial custody by

an order of the Ld. Special Judge (ND&PS) Manipur. The

investigating officer submitted the final complaint (charge-sheet)




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                     Page 14
 dated 03.07.2023 before Ld. Special Judge ND&PS, Manipur.

Therefore, the presence of the petitioner/accused person is no more

required for any further investigation of the case. The charge has not

been framed against the petitioner/accused person till date and the

proceedings of the present trial case has been adjourned without

framing of charges.

                The petitioner/accused person is in the judicial

custody since 10-05-2023 till date and he has spent more than 13

(thirteen) months in judicial custody. The petitioner/accused person

is under trial prisoner and his detention in jail for an indefinite period

violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

                Every person, detained or arrested is entitled to get

speedy trial. It is settled law that bail is the rule and jail an exception

and that the refusal of bail is a restriction on the personnel liberty of

the individualguaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. The

detention of the petitioner/accused Person in jail will not serve any

useful purpose as the investigating authority already submitted the

charge sheet before the Ld. Special Judge, ND&PS, Manipur. There is

no likelihood that the petitioner/accused person will abscond after

releasing him on bail as he has been co-operating with the I.O.

Moreover, there is no question of the petitioner/accused person

hampering or tempering with any prosecution evidence or threating

the witness after the petitioner/accused person is released on bail.




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                         Page 15
                The    material     seized    in   the    present    case     is

"Pseudoephedrine", which is a controlled substance within the

meaning of Section 2(viid) of the Act. It is neither a Narcotic Drugs

nor a Psychotropic substance as envisaged under Section 2(viia) of

the Act. Section 9A of the Act deals with controlled substance is

concerned, there is no categorization of small quantity or commercial

quantity. Therefore, the classification of small quantity, moderate

quantity and Commercial quantity etc. would not be applicable to the

present case. Hence, the bar of Section 37 of the NDPS is not

attracted in the present case.

[13]           The accused through their counsel prays for discharging

the accused from the liability of the case during the course of charge

hearing. But, vide order dated 18.09.2024, the Ld. Special Judge (ND

& PS), Manipur rejected the prayers to discharge the accused

persons from the case and accordingly, charges were framed against

the accused after threadbare discussion and taking into consideration

of the facts and circumstance of the case and the involvement

therein of the accused. The case is registered as Special Trial Case

No. 26 of 2023. The relevant portion of the said order is extracted

herein below:

               "15.   Without going into a detailed discussion about the
                      merits of the case, in the light of the above decision of
                      the Hon'ble SC, I consider that at this stage, there
                      exist sufficient materials showing prima facie case for
                      proceeding against all the accused persons in the
                      case. Based on the materials on record, I find
                      sufficient basis for framing charge for the commission
                      of offence under Section 25/25 A and 21(c) of the



Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                            Page 16
                       NDPS Act as against the accused No. 2 namely, Mrs.
                      Nemkhohat Guite and for the commission of offences
                      under Section 25 A/29 of the NDPS Act and Sections
                      465/487 IPC as against the accused No. 1, 3, 4 and
                      5o. 1, 3, 4 and 5 namely, Md. Abdul Wakil, Shri
                      Bhadresh Patel, Shri Nitin Kumar Panchal and Shri
                      Anilbhai Nayaka (29) respectively. Further, I find
                      sufficient basis for framing charge for the commission
                      of offence under Section 25 A/29 of the NDPS Act as
                      against the accused No. 6 and 7 namely, Shri Harshal
                      Desai and Shri Mehul Desai. The above said charges
                      are to be framed in separate sheets. Therefore,
                      prayers to discharge the accused persons from the
                      case are hereby rejected and the applications filed in
                      that regard also stand disposed of."


               The roles of the applicant/accused above name are

extracted herein below:

              (i)      Bhadresh Patel supplied 1500 packets each

              containing 1000 tablets of Pseudoephedrine out of

              which 533 packets actually seized by the team of NCB

              Imphal     on    03.03.2023     from    the    premises    of

              Jangminghtang Guite.

              (ii)     Bhadresh Patel supplied the Pseudoephedrine

              contents tablets to Abdul Wakil without having any drug

              license or valid documents for which he accepted an

              amount of Rs. 11.68 lakh in his Bank of Baroda account.

              (iii)    Bhadresh Patel in connivance with Harshal Desai,

              Director of Ardro Drug Pvt. Ltd. Tapi, Gujarat received

              the consignment of Pseudoephedrine tablets in the

              name of Admos SR (A non NDPS content drug) on

              receiving instruction from Abdul Wakil.



Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                          Page 17
               (iv)    Bhadresh Patel got prepared fake labeling of

              Cetrizone Hydrochloride tablets 10 mg (Levocet) and

              facilitated Abdul Wakil in safe passage of huge

              consignment of Pseudoephedrine tablets in the false

              billing and sent through Giri Cargo, Ahmedabad for

              further transportation to Delhi.

              (v)     On 18.01.2023 Bhadresh Patel called Videsh Bhai

              Patel (One driver of his native of Awakhal, Vadodra)

              and asked him to deliver 26 carton boxes from Ardor

              Drug Pvt. Ltd., Dev Krupa Estate, Songadh-Ukai Road,

              Tapi to M/s Recover Healthcare, Sarkhej, Ahmedabad.

                      Accordingly, the consignment of Phifed tablets in

              the false billing of Admos SR transported from

              manufacturing unit Tapi to Ahmedabad.

                      Bhadresh Patel made the design the fake lebels

              of Cetrizone Hydrochloride tablets 10 mg (Levocet) from

              one shop Intergraph at Sola Bhuyang Dev, Ahmedabad

              which he further sent to M/s Vardhman Printers at

              Vastrapur, Ahmedabad for final printing which were

              later affixed on all the 1500 packets of Pseudoephedrine

              tablets by his two of the employees namely Nitin Kr.

              Panchal and Anil Nayaka in the godown of M/s Recover

              Healthcare.




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                     Page 18
               (vi)     From analyzing the CDR of Abdul Wakil of his

              mobile no. 9366428134 and Bhadresh Patel mobile no.

              9377958152, it is clear that they were in touch with

              each other and planning for the conspiracy.


              (vii)    During    the   search   of   office-cum-godown

              premises of Bhadresh Patel on 09.05.2023, the fake

              labels of Cetrizine HCL 10 mg (Levocet) tablets

              manufactured by Sunview Biotech was recovered which

              was similar in nature found affixed onto the seized 533

              packets of tablets by NCB Imphal on 03.03.2023.


              (viii)   Bhadresh Patel supplied the huge quantity of

              Pseudoephedrine tablets only on production of fake

              authorization of Elite Medical Store Aizawl, Mizoram by

              Abdul Wakil and that is also in garb of an another drug

              namely Cetrizine HCL 10 mg (Levocet) of which he

              himself got prepared the labels with the help of one

              Kalpan Modi etc.


               The submissions made by Mr. W. Darakishwror, learned

senior PCCG appearing for the respondent (NCB) made in the reply

affidavit are corroborated with the facts and circumstances of the

case set out in the charge sheet.




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                      Page 19
 [14]           The learned Special Judge (ND & PS), Manipur while

passing the impugned order dated 12.09.2023 and while rejecting

the bail application of the present petitioner/accused considered all

these facts i.e. the facts of the case and allegation made against the

present petitioner/accused as narrated above including the health

status report submitted by the Medical Officer, Manipur Central Jail,

Sajiwa.


[15]           Mention is made herein that this Court vide order dated

10.04.2024,    was    pleased   to   grant    an   interim    bail   to    the

petitioner/accused.    Thereafter,    the    accused/petitioner      had    a

Gallbladder removal operation and as per this Court's order, after the

Gallbladder removal operation surrendered before the Sajiwa Jail.

Thereafter, there is no report of further deterioration of the

petitioner/accused while in jail.


[16]           The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner

relied on the following judgments:


                Dhirendra Prakash Saxena V. Directorate of
                Revenue Intelligence [2023 SCC OnLine Del
                2770 : (2023) 385 ELT 662] -
                "34. Judgments relied upon by the learned Sr. SC
                appearing on behalf of the DRI concern grant of bail in
                relation to the satisfaction of the twin conditions contained
                in Section 37 of the NDPS Act. As aforesaid, the position
                that rigors of Section 37 will not applicable in a case where
                in the recovery is that of a controlled substance has been
                clarified by way of various judgments. In Niranjan
                Jayantilal Shah (supra), while granting bail to the applicant
                in a case where 100 kg Pseudoephedrine was recovered, a
                coordinate bench of this Court took note of various other
                decisions involving controlled substances and observed as
                under:


Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                           Page 20
                        "6.    During the course of arguments, it was fairly
                       conceded by learned counsel for the respondent that
                       bar of Section 37 of the NDPS Act is not attracted in
                       the present case since as per the prosecution 100
                       kgs. of Pseudoephedrine was recovered which is a
                       controlled substance within the meaning of Section
                       2(vii)(b) of the Act. Pseudoephedrine is not a
                       narcotics drug as envisaged under Section 2(vii)(a)
                       of the Act. In N.C. Chellathambi (supra) recovery
                       was of 1600 liters of Acctic Anhydride, in Rajiv
                       Kumar @ Sukha (supra) recovery was of 25 kgs
                       powder ephedrine hydrochloride, in Faijay Ahmed
                       Rasool Shaikh (supra) and another recovery was of
                       290 kgs of pseudoephedrine, in Chakrapani Dutt
                       (supra) recovery was of 100 litres of Acctic
                       Anhydride, and inal these cases since the accused
                       had remained in custody for certain period, they
                       were released on bail."

                Manoj        Kumar     V.    Director      of    Revenue
                Intelligence (Through Vikram Singh) [2015 SCC
                OnLine Del 7830 : (2015) 219 DLT 112] -
                "3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner
                is that he was merely an employee of Rakesh Arora, the
                co-accused, who was the kingpin. The petitioner was
                merely acting on the instructions of his employer. Learned
                counsel submits that Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and
                Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act) is not applicable
                in the present case, since pseudoephedrine is not a
                narcotic substance. He submits that the petitioner has
                been in custody since the date of his arrest, i.e.
                02.05.2013. Learned counsel submits that this Court in the
                decision in Niranjan Jayantilal Shah v. Directorate of
                Revenue Intelligence decided on 19.11.2013 (Bail Appl No.
                1202/2013) had granted bail on the accused, where the
                recovery of the same controlled substance had been made
                of 100 kgs. This decision referred to had relied upon
                several other earlier decisions of the Court, where recovery
                of much larger quantities of controlled substance have
                been made.

                10. As noticed above, the petitioner has been in custody
                for nearly 22 months. The decision rendered by this Court
                in Niranjan Jayantilal Shah (supra) shows that in cases
                where quantity of the controlled substance recovered was
                even much larger, the Court had granted bail to the
                accused considering the period for which they had granted
                bail to the accused considering the period for which they
                had remained in custody during the trial. Accordingly, the
                present application is allowed."


Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                          Page 21
                 Tinimo Efere Wowo V. State Govt. of NCT of
                Delhi [2022 SCC OnLine Del 46] -

                 "11. Section 9A of the NDPS Act deals with the power to
                 control and regulate' controlled substance. "Controlled
                 substance" means any substance which the Central
                 Government may, having regard to the available
                 information as to its possible use in the production
                 manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances
                 or to the provisions of any international Convention, by
                 notification be a controlled in the official Gazette, declare
                 substance. The Ministry of Finance Department of
                 Revenue vide its notification dated 28th December, 1999
                 has declared pseudo-ephedrine a controlled substance
                 under the Act. The Central Government being of the
                 opinion that having regard to the use of the controlled
                 substances in the production or manufacture of any
                 narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, it is necessary or
                 expedient so to do in the public interest, in exercise of
                 powers conferred by Section 9A of the Act has made the
                 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation
                 of Controlled Substance) Order, 1993, which has come
                 into force w.e.f. 15th April, 1993.

                 12. The substance alleged to have been recovered from
                 the petitioner/accused is 5 Kg. of pseudoephedrine which
                 is a controlled substance. It has been rightly submitted by
                 the Ld. counsel for the petitioner/accused that it is neither
                 a narcotic drug nor a psychotropic substance under the
                 NDPS Act. The alleged offences are not punishable with
                 death or imprisonment for her NDPS Art The ailing U/s 9A
                 r/w section 254 of the NDPS Act is punishable with
                 imprisonment which may extend to 10 year and also fine
                 which may also extend to imprisonment which may of
                 Section 37 is not attracted in the present case as the
                 substance recovered is a controlled substance within the
                 meaning of Section 2 (viid) of the Act.

                 18. The other recovery from the possession of the
                 petitioner is 15 gm. Cocaine which is also not a
                 commercial quantity, therefore, in the instant case, bar of
                 Section 37 of NDPS Act is not applicable. Though the
                 petitioner is a foreigner but as already observed
                 hereinabove and in view of the judgments "supra" there is
                 no bar to release a foreign national on bail in the given
                 facts and circumstances of this case. In the present case,
                 the petitioner is married to an Indian lady and having kids
                 with her. The factum of his marriage and kids has been
                 verified by the state and statements of the relatives of the
                 wife of the petitioner have already been recorded in this


Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                           Page 22
                  regard. The petitioner is in J.C. since 16.02.2018 and the
                 final conclusion of the trial of this case is likely to take
                 long time. Therefore, the petitioner is admitted to bail on
                 his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-
                 with two solvent sureties each of the like amount subject
                 to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Being released on
                 bail, the petitioner shall inform the IO of the case, the
                 address at which he will reside during, the period he is on
                 bail. Any change in the address shall also be
                 communicated to the 10 of the case within 2 days. The
                 petitioner shall report to the 10 of the case at police
                 station Crime Branch, Delhi every fortnight till the
                 conclusion of the trial. The petitioner shall not leave the
                 limits of NCT of Delhi without prior permission of the Trial
                 Court. With these directions, the application is disposed
                 of. "

                Niranjan Jayantilal Shah V. Directorate of
                Revenue Intelligence [2013 SCC OnLine 4608]
                -

"4. Rebutting the submission of learned counsel for the respondent it was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Rizwan Ahmad, relied upon by learned counsel for the respondent, does not help him, inasmuch as, in that case also recovery was of the controlled substance and therefore Section 37 of NDPS Act was not applicable, yet on that ground alone the application was dismissed. SLP was dismissed by a non- speaking order. In the subsequent case titled as Department of Customs v. Hemant Kumar 2012 [4] JCC [Narcotics] 178 it was observed that the judgment of Rizwan Ahmad is contrary to the explicit language of Section 37 of NDPS Act. The same is per incuriam. That being so, the said order does not come in the way of the petitioner for getting the relief of bail.

6. During the course of arguments, it was fairly conceded by learned counsel for the respondent that bar of Section 37 of the NDPS Act is not attracted in the present case since as per the prosecution 100 kgs. of Pseudoephedrine was recovered which is a controlled substance within the meaning of Section 2(vii) (b) of the Act. Pseudoephedrine is not a narcotics drug as envisaged under Section 2(vii)(a) of the Act. In N.C. Chellathambi (supra) one tonne of ephedrine was recovered, in Ajay Aggarwal (supra) recovery was of 1600 liters of Acctic Anhydride, in Rajiv Kumar Sukha (supra) recovery was of 25 kgs powder ephedrine hydrochloride, in Faiyaz Ahmed Rasool Shaikh (supra) and another recovery was of 290 Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024 Page 23 kgs of pseudoephedrine, in Chakrapani Dutt (supra) recovery was of 100 liters of Acctic Anhydride, and in all these cases since the accused had remained in custody for certain period, they were released on bail. As regards Rizwan Ahmed, where the bail application was dismissed, it is fairly conceded by learned counsel for DRI that DRI had not taken any plea that the petitioner was not entitled to bail due to rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act on which ground alone the application was dismissed, however, it was submitted that since the SLP has been dismissed, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for ball. In Department of Customs (supra) relled upon by learned counsel for the petitioner, it was observed that the judgment in Rizwan Ahmad is contrary to the explicit language of Section 37 of NDPS Act and the same is per incuriam."

[17] It is admitted position of fact and law that the seized articles as mentioned in the present case are controlled drugs as such, Section 37 of the ND & PS Act is not applicable and the accused/petitioner and his co-accused are right now languishing in jail for about one and half years, but considering the nature of the case, the prosecution have taken the steps leading to the filing of charge sheet promptly and the Ld. Trial Court also conducted the case promptly without wasting time.

[18] In the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the role of the present petitioner/accused in commission of the alleged crime set out in the case, this Court is of the view that the Ld. Special Court (ND & PS) rightly passed the impugned order and there is no room for interfering with the impugned order.

Accordingly, the present bail application filed by the accused/petitioner is rejected as devoid of merit. However, the liberty is given to the petitioner/accused to approach the Ld. Special Court Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024 Page 24 wherein, the trial is going on, if the health condition of the accused/petitioner is deteriorating and if need arises for further treatment. The Ld. Trial Court is directed to complete trial of the case as soon as possible.

Accordingly, with the above finding and direction, this bail application is dismissed and disposed of.





                                                 JUDGE




FR/NFR


Bipin




Bail Appln. No. 16 of 2024                                      Page 25