Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Basmati Devi & Ors. vs Sumitra Devi And Ors. on 21 January, 2016

Author: V. Nath

Bench: V. Nath

        Patna High Court SA No.249 of 1991 (29) dt.21-01-2016




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                          Second Appeal No.249 of 1991
                     ======================================================
                     Basmati Devi & Ors.                           .... .... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus
                     Sumitra Devi And Ors.                       .... .... Respondent/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Appellant/s    :   Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar
                                                Mr. Shivaji Singh
                     For the Respondent/s    : Mr. M/S Krishna Bihari
                                                Mr. Vinay Kumar Sinha
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH
                     ORAL ORDER

29   21-01-2016

Nobody appears on behalf of the appellants.

The Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. 4797 of 2010) has been filed stating that the deceased respondent No. 1 Sumitra Devi died about ten years back. The prayer has been made to substitute one son of the deceased respondent No. 1 in her place. However, from perusal of the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the proposed heirs of appellant No. 2, at flag 'Y', it transpires that the deceased respondent No. 1 Sumitra Devi had in fact four sons as mentioned in para 1 of the supplementary affidavit. It also appears from the record that husband of the deceased respondent No. 1 Sumitra Devi is already on record as respondent No. 2.

In view of the fact that the husband of the deceased respondent No. 1 is already on record as respondent No. 2, the name of deceased respondent No. 1 Sumitra Devi is expunged from the memo of appeal.

The substitution application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.

Snkumar/-                                               (V. Nath, J.)
  U