Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Rev. Dr. Moses. Saryug Prasad vs 4.08.19 The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 August, 2019

Author: Debangsu Basak

Bench: Debangsu Basak

                                   1


                      W.P. No.20834 (W) of 2018
                     Rev. Dr. Moses. Saryug Prasad
                                  v.
14.08.19            The State of West Bengal & Ors.
SL-58
Ct-08    Mr. Piush Chaturvedi
(S.R.)   Mr. Anujit Mookherji
         Ms. Shruti Agarwal                 ... for the petitioner.

        Mr. Chandi Charan De
        Mr. Somnath Mukhopadhyay            ... for the State.

        Mr. Mrinal Kanti Ghosh
        Mr. Sounak Bhattacharya             ... for AMC.


              The petitioner complains that, despite an order

        dated July 11, 2011 passed by the West Bengal Land

        Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal (in short 'LRTT'), Third

        Bench in MA 171/2011 (O.A.-2211/2009), the Asansol

        Municipal Corporation is making a construction of a

        water tank at the plot concerned.


              Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner

        submits that, there are disputes with regard to the plots

        owned and possessed by the petitioner pending before the

        LRTT. He submits that, the State is now contending that,

        since, entities holding such land merged into one there is

        allegation of excess holding. Such stand of the State is

        under challenge in the proceeding under the West Bengal

        Land Reforms Act, 1955 before the LRTT. There subsists
                              2


the order dated July 11, 2011, which required the parties

to the proceeding to maintain status quo in respect of the

land in dispute regarding the nature, character and

possession of the suit property till the disposal of the O.A.

No.2211/2009. He submits that, the Asansol Municipal

Corporation is claiming title through the State. Therefore,

the Asansol Municipal Corporation cannot have a higher

or a better right than the State, in respect of the property

concerned.     The State being a party respondent in the

proceeding before the LRTT and the State suffering the order dated July 11, 2011, Asansol Municipal Corporation claiming through the State cannot make any construction at the subject plot.

State and the Asansol Municipal Corporation are represented.

Learned advocate appearing for the Asansol Municipal Corporation submits that, his client was put into possession of the property concerned by the State, in 2006. Asansol Municipal Corporation is constructing a water tank on one of the plots. It is laying out pipelines for the same. He submits that, the Asansol Municipal Corporation is not a party respondent in O.A. No.2211 of 3 2009 before the LRTT. Therefore, Asansol Municipal Corporation is not bound by such order.

As noted above, disputes under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 are pending before the LRTT in O.A. No.2211 of 2009. Asansol Municipal Corporation is trying to make a construction on some of the plots involved in O.A. No. 2211 of 2009. At the highest the Asansol Municipal Corporation can claim title as that of the State, in respect of such property. In the event, the applicant before the LRTT succeeds in establishing that, the applicant has right, title and interest in respect of the plot concerned, then, Asansol Municipal Corporation will have no right of construction thereat. Therefore, as an interim measure, it would be appropriate to direct the Asansol Municipal Corporation to adhere to the order dated July 11, 2011 passed in O.A. No.2211 of 2009 pending before the LRTT till the disposal of the same or until further orders of the LRTT whichever is earlier.

This order, however, will not prevent Asansol Municipal Corporation from taking appropriate steps in the pending matter before the LRTT, in accordance with law.

4

No further interference is called for. W.P. No.20834 (W) of 2018 is disposed of without any order as to costs.

Urgent certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance of the requisite formalities.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)