Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Seema Rani vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 8 December, 2009

Author: Ajai Lamba

Bench: Ajai Lamba

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

                            CHANDIGARH.




                                     Civil Writ Petition No. 16324 of 2009

                            DATE OF DECISION : DECEMBER 8, 2009




SEEMA RANI

                                                     ....... PETITIONER(S)

                                VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

                                                     .... RESPONDENT(S)



CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA



PRESENT: Mr. SK Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
         Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab.


AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)

This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed praying for quashing of order dated 22.10.2009 (Annexure P-9) whereby appointment of the petitioner as Teaching Fellow has been cancelled, on the ground that the certificate of experience, on which reliance had been placed by the petitioner, was found to be bogus.

There has been a subsequent development in so much as the respondents have agreed to reconsider the cases of persons similarly situated as the petitioner. All the persons have been given the right to Civil Writ Petition No. 16324 of 2009 2 approach a specially constituted Committee to show that the certificates/documents relied upon by them were genuine. After considering the claim of such persons, orders are required to be passed afresh.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that even the petitioner has appeared before the Committee and has projected her case, stating that the experience certificate at issue is genuine.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of. The respondents are required to pass fresh orders after consideration of the claim of the petitioner.

December 8, 2009                                           ( AJAI LAMBA )
Kang                                                               JUDGE



1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?