Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad

Krishna vs Sri Sujeet Kumar Jha Drm Ner on 10 August, 2021

                                    CCP No. 330/00013/2018 in OA No.1118/2002




                                                                    Open Court


                   CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                         ALLAHABAD BENCH
                             ALLAHABAD.

                  Allahabad, this the 10th day of August 2021

Civil Misc. Contempt Petition No.330/00013/2018
in
Original Application No. 330/01118/2002

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vijay Lakshmi, Member (Judicial)
Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (Administrative)

     1. Krishna, son of Nagina Chaudhary, Resident of Village Chochi, Post
        Hathuwa Semrawn, District Gopalganj (Bihar).
     2. Chandrama Chaudhary, son of Jewat Chaudhary, Resident of Chonchali,
        Post Hathuwa Semrawn, District Gopalganj (Bihar).
     3. Hari Shankar Yadav, son of Sri Suraj Yadav, Resident of village Wari
        Dewaria, Post Hathuwa, District Gopalganj (Bihar).

                                                                  . . .Petitioners
By Advocate : Shri G.S. Mishra

                                   VERSUS

Sri Sujeet Kumar Jha, Divisional Rail Manager, North East Railway Varanasi.



                                                               . . .Respondents
By Adv: Shri P.K. Pandey

                                   ORDER

By Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vijay Lakshmi, Member (Judicial) Shri L.S. Kushwaha holding brief of Shri G.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and P.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the order in respect of which this contempt proceeding is pending has been complied in letter and spirit. Therefore, he has prayed that the contempt proceedings may be closed. Page 1 of 2

CCP No. 330/00013/2018 in OA No.1118/2002

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly conceded that the order has substantially been complied and therefore the contempt proceeding may be closed.

5. In view of the above, the instant contempt proceedings are liable to be closed and are closed and notice issued to the respondents stands discharged.

6. All the MAs pending in this contempt petition are disposed of as having being infructuous.

        (Tarun Shridhar)                       (Justice Vijay Lakshmi)
     Member(Administrative)                      Member(Judicial)


RKM/




                                                                     Page 2 of 2