Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mr. Karthikeya P vs M/S. Quees Gate Apartments Owners ... on 9 February, 2026

Author: B.M.Shyam Prasad

Bench: B.M.Shyam Prasad

                                   -1-
                                                  NC: 2026:KHC:7461
                                                WP No. 3847 of 2026


            HC-KAR




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

             DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                BEFORE

            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

                 WRIT PETITION NO. 3847 OF 2026 (GM-RES)


            BETWEEN:

            1.    MR. KARTHIKEYA P
                  AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
                  S/O SRI P PRABHAKARA RAO
                  R/AT C2704, QUEENS GATE APARTMENT,
                  HIRANANDANI BANNERGHATTA
                  QUEENSGATE, BEGUR VILLAGE,
                  BANGALORE 560076.

            2.    MR MANOJ JAIN,
Digitally         S/O GYAN CHANDRA JAIN
signed by
VANAMALA          AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
N
Location:         R/AT FLAT NO C901
HIGH
COURT OF          HOUSE OF HIRANANDANI, BEGUR
KARNATAKA         HULIVAMAVU ROAD,
                  AKSHAYA NAGAR,
                  BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
                  BANGALORE 560068

                  REGISTERED POA HOLDER OF
                  A. VIBHOR JAIN
                  B. DIVYANGANA JAIN.
                      -2-
                                     NC: 2026:KHC:7461
                                 WP No. 3847 of 2026


HC-KAR




3.   MR ASHISH SHAKYA,
     S/O D LAL SHAKYA,
     AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
     R/AT FLAT NO.C2703
     HOUSE OF HIRANANDANI,
     BEGUR - HULIVAMAVU ROAD,
     AKSHAYA NAGAR,
     BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
     BANGALORE 560068.

4.   DR.B.SRINIVAS KAKKILAYA
     AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
     S/O LATE B.V.KAKKILAYA,
     R/AT FLAT NO A1404
     HOUSE OF HIRANANDANI, BEGUR -
     HULIVAMAVU ROAD,
     AKSHAYA NAGAR,
     BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
     BANGALORE 560068.

5.   MR. RAHUL MEENA,
     S/O MR.SITA RAM MEENA,
     AGED ABOUT 32,
     FLAT NO.B1008,
     HOUSE OF HIRANANDANI,
     BEGUR-HULIMAVU ROAD,
     AKSHAYA NAGAR,
     BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
     BANGALORE 560068.

6.   MR. SOHAM SURYAVANSHI
     AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
     S/O AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH,
     FLAT NO. C401,
                      -3-
                                     NC: 2026:KHC:7461
                                   WP No. 3847 of 2026


HC-KAR




     HOUSE OF HIRANANDARI,
     BENGALURU-560 068.

                              ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. YADUNANDAN N.,ADVOCATE)


AND:

1.   M/S QUEES GATE APARTMENTS
     OWNERS ASSOCIATION
     AN ASSOCIATION REGISTERED
     UNDER KARNATAKA APARTMENT
     OWNERSHIP ACT
     REGD. NO.116/22-23
     REGISTERED OFFICE AT,
     QUEENS GATE,
     HOUSE OF HIRANANDANI,
     BEGUR-HULIMAVU ROAD,
     AKSHAYA NAGAR,
     BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
     BANGALORE 560068
     REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED
     REPRESENTATIVE/SECRETARY.

2.   MS. INDARANI GORAI
     PRESIDENT OF QUEENS GATE
     APARTMENT OF OWNERS ASSOCIATION,
     RESIDING AT
     FLAT NO.A2102
     QUEENS GATE,
     HOUSE OF HIRANANDANI,
     BEGUR-HULIMAVU ROAD,
     AKSHAYA NAGAR,
                           -4-
                                              NC: 2026:KHC:7461
                                            WP No. 3847 of 2026


 HC-KAR




     BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
     BANGALORE 560068.

3.   MR.AMIT SURYA
     SECRETARY OF QUEENS GATE
     APARTMENTS OWNERS ASSOCIATION
     RESIDING AT FLAT NO.A1503
     QUEENS GATE,
     HOUSE OF HIRANANDANI,
     BEGUR-HULIMAVU ROAD,
     AKSHAYA NAGAR,
     BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
     BANGALORE - 560068.
                               ...RESPONDENTS


       THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-
I)         QUASHING             THE           ELECTION
NOTIFICATION/NOTICE             DATED         08.01.2026
(ANNEXURE        -B)       AND        THE     ELECTION
RULES/ANNEXURE-2 (ANNEXURE -D), INSOFAR AS
THEY MANDATE OR PERMIT ELECTRONIC VOTING
THROUGH THE MYGATE PLATFORM, DISPENSE
WITH      THE    PROXY    MECHANISM,         IMPOSE    A
REQUIREMENT TO VOTE FOR 15 CANDIDATES,
AND DISQUALIFY DEEMED MEMBERS/POWER-OF-
ATTORNEY        HOLDERS   FROM        CONTESTING,     AS
BEING CONTRARY TO THE REGISTERED BYE-LAWS
AND SECTION 16 OF THE KARNATAKA APARTMENT
                              -5-
                                               NC: 2026:KHC:7461
                                             WP No. 3847 of 2026


HC-KAR




OWNERSHIP ACT, 1972 AND CONSEQUENTLY NULL
AND OF NO EFFECT; II) ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS          DIRECTING         THE     RESPONDENT
ASSOCIATION TO CONDUCT ELECTIONS TO THE
MANAGEMENT           COMMITTEE             STRICTLY    IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGISTERED DEED OF
DECLARATION         AND       BYE-LAWS,       INCLUDING
ELIGIBILITY,     NOMINATIONS,        AND     VOTING    (IN
PERSON      OR     THROUGH          DULY     AUTHORISED
PROXY), AND TO ENSURE VOTING IS CONDUCTED
BY SECRET PAPER BALLOT AT A DULY CONVENED
GENERAL BODY MEETING; III) AND FURTHER
DIRECT THAT SUCH ELECTIONS BE SUPERVISED
BY AN INDEPENDENT RETURNING OFFICER OR
ANY OTHER AUTHORITY THIS HONBLE COURT
DEEMS APPROPRIATE, AND THAT THE ENTIRE
PROCESS BE COMPLETED WITHIN A TIME-FRAME
FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT.


     THIS        PETITION,         COMING      ON     FOR

PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS

MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
                                -6-
                                                     NC: 2026:KHC:7461
                                               WP No. 3847 of 2026


HC-KAR




                       ORAL ORDER

After being heard for some time, Sri Yadunandan N, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that, given the petitioners' grievance with the lack of an effective adjudicatory process when there are disputes about the manner in which the affairs of a 'Society' constituted for the welfare of the Apartment Owners' Unit are conducted, that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a comprehensive petition.

The request is accepted, and the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners, subject to all just exceptions, to file a comprehensive petition.

SD/-

(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-