Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

The Nasik Jila Mahila Sahakari Bank Ltd vs Mateen Nisar Sayeed And Ors. on 16 October, 2025

2025:BHC-AS:45770




                                                                                 54-ALP-274-2019.doc




      MJ Jadhav
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                           APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 274 OF 2019


                          The Nasik Jila Mahila Sahakari Bank Ltd.                ... Applicant
                                         Vs.
                          Mateen Nisar Sayeed And Ors.                            ... Respondents


                          Ms. Chaitali Bhogle i/b Vishal Tambat for the Applicant.
                          Mr. Prasanna Malshe, APP for the State.
            Digitally
            signed by


  JAYWANT
  JADHAV
            MANGALTAI
  MANGALTAI JAYWANT
            JADHAV
            Date:
                                                            CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
            2025.10.17
            18:16:35
            +0530

                                                            DATED : 16th OCTOBER 2025


                          ORDER:

1. This application is filed by the original complainant under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking leave to file appeal. The applicant is the complainant in the complaint filed under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. By the impugned order respondent nos. 1 to 3 are acquitted.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of the recent decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of M/s. Celestium Financial Versus. A. Gnanasekaran1, the applicant would be entitled to file an appeal under Section 372 of Code of Criminal Procedure. He therefore seeks leave to withdraw this 1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 Page no. 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 17/10/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2025 00:46:17 ::: 54-ALP-274-2019.doc application with liberty to file an appeal under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. in the Sessions Court. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant be granted benefit of the period of pendency of this application for seeking condonation of delay.

3. In view of the legal principles settled in the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the applicant is granted leave to withdraw this application with liberty to file an appeal under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. before the Sessions Court.

4. This application is filed on 16th July 2019. Hence, it is clarified that if an appeal under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. is filed within eight weeks from today, the applicant shall be entitled to seek benefit of the period of pendency of this application for seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the Sessions Court.

5. The Application is disposed of as withdrawn subject to the aforesaid liberty.

(GAURI GODSE, J.) Page no. 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 17/10/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2025 00:46:17 :::