Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rahul Pandey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 15 May, 2023

Author: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Bench: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

                                                            1

     ITEM NO.12                                  COURT NO.1                      SECTION II-A

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

               Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                     No(s).608/2018

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-02-2017
     in MCRC No. 1324/2017 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Indore)

     RAHUL PANDEY                                                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.                                           Respondent(s)

     (WITH IA No. 131217/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

     Date : 15-05-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

     For Petitioner(s)                     Mr. Amish Aggarwala, AOR
                                           Mr. Rajat Bhatia, Adv.
                                           Mrs. Ekta Mudgil, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                     Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, AOR
                                           Mr. Abhisek Mohanty, Adv.

                                           Mrs. Ankita Choudhary, A.A.G.
                                           Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR
                                           Mr. Anurag Singh, Adv.
                                           Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv.
                                           Ms. Ayushi Mittal, Adv.
                                           Mr. Vipul Abhishek, Adv.
                                           Mr. Kuldeep Kumar Shukla, Adv.


                           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R
1 Signature Not Verified

A joint application dated 12 May 2023 has been filed by the petitioner and the Digitally signed by Sanjay Kumar Date: 2023.05.15 second respondent in pursuance of a settlement which was arrived at in the 17:01:58 IST Reason:

course of the mediation proceedings before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre.
2

2 The settlement which is annexed to the joint application shall form an annexure to this order.

3 In terms of the settlement, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has handed over a demand draft in the amount of Rs 30 lakhs to the counsel for the second respondent.

4 The following proceedings by and between the parties shall stand quashed:

(a) FIR No 919/2016 PS Vijay Nagar, Indore, MP) under Sections 498A, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code 1860 against the petitioner and his family members;
(b) Case No MJCR 200039/2017 pending before the Family Court Ujjain, MP under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 1 against the petitioner;
(c) Case No MCRC 1582/2018 and MCRC 16559/2019 under Section 482 CrPC pending before the Madhya Pradesh High Court; and
(d) Appeal filed in Case No. MP13010020022023 (CRA/32/2023) pending before the District and Sessions Court, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh as CRA for DV case under Section 29.

5 Both the counsel state that the parties have been living apart since 2016. 6 In view of the above circumstances and since there is no likelihood of reconciliation, it has been agreed that the parties shall jointly apply to this Court for a decree for divorce by mutual consent.

1 “CrPC 3 7 In exercise of the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, in terms of the request which is made in the joint application, and in the course of submission by the counsel, we order and direct that there shall be a decree for divorce by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution. 8 The Registry shall draw up a decree in terms of the present order and as set out in the settlement agreement before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. 9 The Special Leave Petition is accordingly disposed of. 10 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

        (SANJAY KUMAR-I)                                 (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
        DEPUTY REGISTRAR                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                 ANNEXURE A-1              16



        SLP (CRL) NO. 608 OF 2018




                                    28th
April
17
18
19
20
21
      22




���