Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Rameshan B vs Sri.S.Ajayan on 17 August, 2012

Author: S. Siri Jagan

Bench: S.Siri Jagan

       

  

  

 
 
                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                        PRESENT:

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN

             WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/14TH BHADRA 1934

                                        Con.Case(C).No. 1339 of 2012 (S)
                                      ---------------------------------------------------
                     AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.19625/2012 DATED 17-08-2012
                                                         --------------

PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
---------------------------------------

             RAMESHAN B.,
             S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, AGED 53 YEARS
             ASSISTANT MANAGER
             MATSYAFED NET FACTORY, AZHEEKKAL P.O., AZHIKODE
             KANNUR-670 009.

             BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 :
----------------------------------------------------------

          1. SRI.S.AJAYAN
              FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
              MANAGING DIRECTOR
              KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION FOR
              FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT LIMITED (MATSYAFED)
              KAMALESWARAM, MANACAUD P.O.
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 009.

          2. T.J.JOHNSON
              FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
              MANAGER, MATSYAFED NET FACTORY, AZHEEKAL
              KANNUR.

              R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, SC, MATSYAFED


            THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 05-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn


                                                                                             ...2/-

Con.Case(C).No. 1339 of 2012 (S)

                                    APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :


ANNEXURE I      : COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 17.8.2012 IN WPC
                  NO. 19625/2012.


ANNEXURE II     : COPY OF THE FAX MESSAGE SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO
                  THE RESPONDENTS ON 18.8.2012.


ANNEXURE III    : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 18.8.2012 ISSUED BY THE
                  1ST RESPONDENT TOT HE PETITIONER.


ANNEXURE IV     : COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD WITH RESPECT TO THE
                  1ST RESPONDENT.


ANNEXURE V      : COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD WITH RESPECT TO THE
                  2ND RESPONDENT.


ANNEXURE VI       COPY OF THE OFFICE ORDER DATED 22.8.2012 ISSUED BY THE
                  DISTRICT MANAGER, MATSYAFED, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE.



RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :         NIL


                                                               //TRUE COPY//



                                                              P.S. TO JUDGE

Mn



                          S. Siri Jagan, J.
            =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                Cont. Case (C). No. 1339 of 2012
            =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
           Dated this, the 5th day of September, 2012.

                             O R D E R

This contempt is filed for non-compliance with Annexure I interim order by which, on 17.8.2012, I directed maintenance of status quo as on that date till the next posting date in respect of the transfer of the petitioner from Kannur to Kasaragod. The petitioner's grievance is that by Annexure III dated 18.8.2012, the Managing Director had directed to relieve all incumbents concerned immediately without delay. The petitioner apprehends that pursuant to Annexure III order, the petitioner will be relieved like in the case of another person covered by Annexure VI order. Learned standing counsel for the Matsyafed assures the Court that the petitioner has not been relieved contrary to Annexure I order. This is recorded and the contempt case is closed.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/