Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Doddaboramma vs Smt. Shashikala on 15 November, 2021

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty

                         1




IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
     DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
                     BEFORE
 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
     REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1682 OF 2018

BETWEEN:

1.     SMT. DODDABORAMMA
       W/O LATE MADAPPA
       AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
       R/O B 22-B, 9TH BLOCK,
       IN FRONT OF ESHWARA TEMPLE
       THOTADA MANE SRIRAMPURA
       MYSURU

2.     SRI KARIBASAPPA
       S/O LATE MADAPPAA
       AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
       R/O B-22-B, 9TH BLOCK
       IN FRONT OF ESHWARA TEMPLE
       THOTTADAMANE SRIRAMPURA
       MYSURU

3.     KUMARI MANJULA
       D/O LATE MADAPPA
       AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
       R/O IN FRONT OF
        ESHWARA TEMPLE
       9TH BLOCK B-22-B
       THOTTADAMANE
       SRIRAMPURA MYSURU            ...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. K.R.LINGARAJU, ADVOCATE)
                         2




AND:

1.     SMT. SHASHIKALA
       W/O KRISHNAMURTHY
       D/O MADAPPA
       AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
       R/O AGARA VILLAGE
       YELANDUR TALUK
       CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

2.     SMT MAHADEVAMMA
       W/O NAGARAJU
       AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
       R/O NO.664, 3RD MAIN,
       15TH CROSS ARAVINDANAGAR
       MYSURU

3.     SMT LAXMI
       W/O ASHWATH
       AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
       R/O KRIRANGUR POST
       SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK
       MANDYA DISTRICT

4.     HOMBAMMA
       SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
       SRI G N SHIVANNA
       S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH
       AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS,
       R/O NO.66, 5TH CROSS,
       5TH MAIN RPC LAYOUT
       BENGALURU560040

5.     SMT G N SHANTHAMMA
       D/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH
       W/O LATE CHIKKANANJEGOWDA
       AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
                        3




     R/O NO.338, 6TH CROSS,
     7TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT
     BENGAURU

6.   SMT G N SUBHADRAMMA
     D/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH
     W/O ALTE RANGASWAMY
     AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
     R/O NO.13, 10TH CROSS,
     PAPAREDDYPALYA
     BENGALURU-560072

7.   SMT G N KEMPAMMA
     D/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH
     W/O LATE BYREGOWDA
     AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
     R/O NO.257, 6TH A CROSS,
     RPC LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560040

8.   SRI G N NANJUNDAIAH
     S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
     R/O GANAKAL VILLAGE
     GANKAKL POST, BIDADI HOBLI
     RAMANAGARA DISTRICT

9.   SRI G N VEEREGOWDA
     S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
     R/O NO.206/A, 1ST N BLOCK
     RAJAJINAGAR 1ST STAGE
     BEHIND VIDYAVARDHAKA SANGHA
     BENGALURU-560010

10 . SRI G N SREEKANTAIAH
     S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
                       4




      R/O NO.47, 3RD CROSS
      BASAVESWARA LAYOUT
      NEAR CHANDRA LAYOUT
      POLICE STATION
      CHANDRA LAYOUT
      BENGALURU

11 . SMT G N PADMA
     D/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH
     W/O LATE K SHIVALINGAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
     R/O VIDYANAGAR
     TUMKUR

12 . SRI DINESH H M
     S/O H R MANJAPPA GOWDA
     AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
     R/O ANTHAWANE
     NARASIMRAJA TALUK
     CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT

13 . SRI N MOHAN RAJ
     S/O NARASHIMEGOWDA
     AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
     R/O KARIKYATHANAHALLI
     DIDDIGE POST
     CHENNARAYAPATNA TALUK
     HASSAN DISTRICT

14.   SRI DEVARAJU
      S/O MADAPPA
      AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
      R/O ESHWARA TEMPLE,
      9TH BLOCK B 22-B
      THOTTADAMANE SRIRAMPURA
      MYSURU
                           ...RESPONDENTS
                               5




    THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED
UNDER SECTION.100 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD 14.12.2017 PASSED
IN RA.NO.76/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.
DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE
THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND   DECREE    DTD   09.01.2015  PASSED    IN
OS.NO.889/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE
BELUR.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                           JUDGMENT

This Court on 08.11.2019 had granted three weeks' time to comply with the office objections with an observation that if the office objections are not complied with, the appeal shall be listed for dismissal. However, till date the office objections are not complied with.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE JS/-