Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Madhusudan Das Mandhara & Anr vs M/S. U.K. Engineers & Contractors & Anr on 30 April, 2018

Author: Soumen Sen

Bench: Soumen Sen

ORDER
                                 CS No. 188 of 1991
                           IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                       Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction


                        MADHUSUDAN DAS MANDHARA & ANR.
                                    Versus
                   M/S. U.K. ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS & ANR.



         BEFORE:
         The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN

Date : 30th April 2018.

The plaintiff is not represented.

The suit had appeared in the Warning List before being transferred to this Bench. The report filed by the department shows that the plaintiff has not taken any steps to lodge the writ of summons. The report filed by the department is kept with the record. The time to lodge the writ of summons has expired long back. There is nothing on record to show that the plaintiff has taken out any application for extension of time to lodge the writ of summons. It appears that the plaintiff has not taken any steps in this regard. The plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the suit.

Under such circumstances, the suit stands dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

(SOUMEN SEN, J.) B.pal.