Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

3The Ndrf Assam Rifles C/O Apo vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 10 April, 2023

Author: Suman Shyam

Bench: Suman Shyam

                                                                     Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010096662022




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/3405/2022

            TENZING SHERPA
            S/O. LT. PASSANG SHERPA, SERVING AS A HAVILDAR/GD IN THE 1ST
            ASSAM RIFLES C/O. 99 APO, PIN-932001, PRESENTLY ON DEPUTATION AT
            13THE NDRF ASSAM RIFLES C/O APO.



            VERSUS

            THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
            REP. BY THE SECRETARY, THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME
            AFFAIR NEW DELHI-110001.

            2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL

             ASSAM RIFLES
             HEAD QUARTER DIRECTORATE GENERAL
             ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG-11.

            3:THE COMMANDANT 1ST ASSAM RIFLES

             C/O. 99 APO
             PIN-932001.

            4:THE COMMANDANT 13TH NATIONAL DISASTER RESPONSE FORCE

             ASSAM RIFLES C/O. 99 APO.

            5:G/01110880K WO/GD GOVERDHAN SINGH
             C/O. COMMANDANT 1ST ASSAM RIFLES
             C/O. 99 APO
             PIN-932001

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MS. S BORA
                                                                                  Page No.# 2/3


Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.




                                   BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

                                             ORDER

Date : 10-04-2023 Heard Ms. S. Bora, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.D. Deka, learned CGC appearing for the respondent who submits on instructions obtained as per order dated 08-02-2023 passed by this Court that adverse remarks in the ACR of the petitioner for the year 2018-19, had not been communicated to him. If that be so, the ACR for the year 2018-19 could not have been considered by the authorities for denying promotion/ ACP benefit to the petitioner.

The learned CGC also does not dispute the said position. However, the only issue that confronts this Court, at this stage, is as to whether the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of promotion with retrospective effect as well as the ACP scheme.

Mr. Deka seeks time till 27-04-2023 to obtain further instruction and produce the records so as to address the aforesaid issue.

Prayer allowed.

Let this matter be listed again on 27-04-2023, as a fixed item.

JUDGE GS Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant