Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

Nck Sons Exports P.Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Cir Cir 2(2), Mumbai on 6 August, 2018

           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                 MUMBAI BENCH "B", MUMBAI

     BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
         SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                      ITA No.4642/M/2014
                    Assessment Year: 1997-98

       M/s. NCK Sons Exports          Dy. CIT, Cir. 2(2),
       Pvt. Ltd.,                     Room No.577,
       Flat No.401, 4th Floor,        Aayakar Bhavan,
                               th
       Munshi Manor, 9/10         Vs. M.K. Road,
       Road,                          Mumbai - 400020
       Khar (W),
       Mumbai - 400 052
       PAN: AAACN1629B
              (Appellant)                 (Respondent)

     Present for:
     Assessee by                  : Shri AnantSawant, A.R.
     Revenue by                   : Shri T.A. Khan, D.R.

     Date of Hearing              : 19.07.2018
     Date of Pronouncement        : 06.08.2018

                             ORDER

Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member:

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 25.02.2010 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 1997-98.

2. At the outset, we would like to mention that the assessee filed adjournment letter for adjourning the case. After perusal of the order sheet entry, we find that on several occasions the assessee applied for the adjournments which were granted also. A perusal of the order of Ld. CIT(A) and AO reveals that assessee has not appeared before either of the parties below and assessment was framed under section 144/254 of the Act.

2 M/s. NCK Sons Exports Pvt. Ltd.

Therefore, we are inclined not to grant any adjournment of hearing today and the case is being heard on merit after hearing both the parties.

3. After hearing the Ld. D.R. and perusing the facts on record, we find that the assessment was framed ex-parte under section 144 of the Act by the AO. Similarly, the Ld. CIT(A) also framed ex-parte appellate order due to non appearance of the assessee or its authorized representative . The assessee has taken a ground challenging the ex-parte order on the ground that no reasonable opportunity of being heard was given to the assessee thereby causing miscarriage of natural justice. Under these circumstances, we feel that the assessee should be granted one more opportunity to present his case before the AO. Accordingly, we restore the issue back to the file of the AO with a direction to hear the assessee and frame the assessment as per facts and law. Assessee is also directed to appear before the AO within one month from the date of receipt of this order of the Tribunal and also as and when required by the AO in connection with the hearing of this case. Since we have restored the issue back to the file of the AO the other grounds of the assessee need not be adjudicated.

4. The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 06.08.2018.

          Sd/-                                             Sd/-
   (Joginder Singh)                                  (Rajesh Kumar)
  JUDICIAL MEMBER                                 ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated: 06.08.2018.
* Kishore, Sr. P.S.
                                                              ITA No.4642/M/2014
                                 3                 M/s. NCK Sons Exports Pvt. Ltd.


Copy to: The Appellant
         The Respondent
         The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
         The CIT (A) Concerned, Mumbai
         The DR Concerned Bench
//True Copy//                              [




                                           By Order

Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.