Karnataka High Court
Fatobi W/O Fakrusab Halemani vs Shekappa S/O Ningappa Annigeri on 13 March, 2020
Author: S.Sujatha
Bench: S.Sujatha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13 T H DAY OF MARCH, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
WRIT PETI TION NO.106309/2018(GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. FATOBI W/O FAKRUSAB HALEMANI
AGE:MAJOR, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O:JADGERI ONI, ANNIGERI 582201
TQ:NAVALGUND, D IS T:DHARWAD
2. MAHAMMADALI S/O FAKRUSAB HALEMASUTI
AGE:57 Y EARS, OCC:AGRICULTU RE,
R/O:JADGERI ONI, ANNIGERI 582201
TQ:NAVALGUND, D IS T:DHARWAD
3. SHAMASHAADABEGUM W/O ABDULSAB BAGI,
AGE:MAJOR, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O:NEAR KSRTC BUS S TAND, SOUNSHI 581117
TQ:KUNDAGOL, DIST:DHARWAD
4. NAJIMA BEGUM W/O NOORSAB KHA DARNAVAR
AGE:MAJOR, OCC:AGRICVULTURE,
R/O:NEAR GOURI TEMPLE,
BETAGERI 582102, TQ & D IS T:GADAG
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.MALLIKARJUN S.H IREMA TH, ADV.)
AND
1. SHEKAPPA S/O NINGAPPA ANNIGERI
AGE:48 Y EARS, OCC:AGEICULTU RE,
2. PARASHURAM S/O SHIVAPPA ADAKAVU
AGE:53 Y EARS, OCC:AGRICULTU RE
2
3. BASAPPA S/O PURADAPPA ADAKAVU
AGE:63 Y EARS, OCC:AGRICULTU RE
4. BASAPPA S/O NINGAPPA ADAKAVU
AGE:27 Y EARS, OCC:AGRICULTU RE
5. SHEKAPPA S/O BA RAMAPPA ADAKAVU
AGE:53 Y EARS, OCC:AGRICULTU RE
ALL ARE R/O JAD GERI ONI,
ANNIGERI 582201,
TQ:NAVALGUND,
DIST:DHARWAD
... RESPONDENTS
(R1 TO R5 SERVICE OF NO TICE IS H ELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITU TION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A.
QUASH THE ORDER DATED:18.08.2018 AT ANNEXURE- D
PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
JMFC, NAVALGUND IN O.S.NO.118/2013 AND ALLOW THE
I.A. DATED;26.07.2018 (ANNEXU RE-C) FILED F OR
AMENDMENT OF WS;
B. QUASH THE ORDER DA TED :14.09.2018 AT
ANNEXURE-G PAS SED BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL
CIVIL JUDGE JM FC, NA VALGUND N O.S.NO .118/2013
DELETNG THE NAME OF DEFENDANT NO.3 ON MEMO
FILED FOR DELETION OF THE NAME OF DEFENDANT
NO.3.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLO WING:
3
ORDER
In view of the original suit No.118/2013 on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Navalgund being disposed of, writ petition filed against the order passed on I.A. in the original suit does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE M BS /-