Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

M/S Bma Prints Private Limited vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 31 October, 2022

Bench: Arup Kumar Goswami, Sanjay Agrawal

                                   1


                                                                      NAFR

          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                        WPC No. 3955 of 2022

  1. M/s. BMA Prints Private Limited, a company duly incorporated

     under relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its

     office at B-155, Shivalik Malviya Nagar, New Delhi-17 through its

     Director, Shri Atul Agrawal, son of Shri B.M.Agrawal, aged about

     40 years, resident of Plot No. 157, 3 rd Floor, Sector-56,

     Gurugram- 122011

  2. Atul Agrawal son of Shri B.M.Agrawal, aged about 40 years,

     Director M/s. BMA Prints Private Limited, New Delhi and resident

     of Plot No. 157, 3rd Floor, Sector 56, Gurugram - 122011

                                                             ---- Petitioners

                               Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary/Joint Secretary, Ministry

  of Health and Family Welfare Secretariat, Capital Complex,

  Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director, Directorate of Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya

  Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chhattisgarh   Medical   Services    Corporation   Ltd.    Through     its

  Managing Director, Commercial Complex, Sector 27, Naya Raipur,

  District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                                                        ---- Respondents

(Cause Title taken from Case Information System) 2 For Petitioner : Mr. B.P.Sharma alongwith Ms. Anuja Sharma, Advocates.

For Respondents 1&2 : Mr. H.S.Ahluwalia, Deputy Advocate General For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate.

Hon'ble Mr. Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice 31/10/2022 Mr. B.P.Sharma, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners submits that the grievance articulated in this petition having been redressed, he has got instructions not to press this petition.

2. Mr. H.S.Ahluwalia, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2 as well as Mr. Animesh Tiwari, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 3 have no objection.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.

                             Sd/-                                       Sd/-

                  (Arup Kumar Goswami)                         (Sanjay Agrawal)
                      CHIEF JUSTICE                                JUDGE




Amit