Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Hafizulla vs State on 8 August, 2008

Author: S. Dave

Bench: Anant S. Dave, S. Dave

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/8507/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 8507 of 2008
 

with
 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION NO. 8500 OF 2008
 

 
==========================================
 

HAFIZULLA
RAHEMTULLA SHAIKH - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

========================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR ASHISH H
SHAH for Applicant(s) : 1, 
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
for Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR YATIN SONI for Respondent(s) :
2, 
==========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 08/08/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER 

Both these petitions are filed by the petitioner to quash and set aside the impugned complaint on the ground that in the back drop of the allegation the offences registered do not disclose the ingredients.

Section 387 of the IPC it petains to quote a person for committing of extortion puts or attempts to put any person in fear of death or of grievous hurt to that person. The definition of Extortion is defined in Section 383 of I.P.C.

So far as sections 504 and 506(2) of the IPC are concerned the bare perusal of the complaint shows that the averments of administration of threats to the life of the complaint do not disclose the offences.

In that view of the matter no interference is called for in exercise of power and hence, the petition is rejected. Interim relief stands vacated.

(Anant S. Dave,J) mary//     Top