Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Radhika Yadav vs Union Of India on 12 January, 2017

Author: P. Sam Koshy

Bench: P. Sam Koshy

                                1




                                                              NAFR
        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                       WPS No. 121 of 2017
1. Smt. Radhika Yadav W/o Shri Omkar, Aged About 27 Years
2. Smt. Nitya Bai Manikpuri, W/o Shri Kamata Das, Aged About 34
   Years
3. Smt. Kanti Bai Vishwakarma, W/o Shri Santram, Aged About 41
   Years
4. Smt. Kaushilya Bai Sahu, W/o Shri Purshottam, Aged About 34
   Years
   Petitionere No.1 to 4 R/o Village Baihar, Block Arng, District
   Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
5. Smt. Nirmla Bai Dewangan, W/o Shri Harishchandra, Aged
   About 38 Years
6. Smt. Dhan Bai Nishad, W/o Shri Shiv Kumar, Aged About 39
   Years
7. Smt. Anju Bai Yadav, W/o Shri Mansingh, Aged About 28 Years
8. Smt. Tarni Pandey, W/o Shri Visheshar Ram, Aged About 38
   Years
9. Smt. Lemin Bai Kumhar, W/o Shri Bulaki Ram, Aged About 24
   Years
   Petitioner No.5 to 9 R/o Village Samoda, Block Arang, District
   Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
                                                   ---- Petitioners
                               Versus


1. Union Of India Through: Secretary, Ministry Of Human
   Resources Development, Department Of School Education And
   Literacy, Mid Day Meal Division, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi
2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Department Of
   Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District
   Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. Directorate, School Education, Through : The Director, School
   Education, Shiksha Parisar, Pension Bada, Raipur, District
   Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Block Education Officer, Arang, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Government Middle School, Baihar, Through: The Head Master,
   Government Middle School, Baihar, Block Arang, District Raipur
   (Chhattisgarh)
6. Government Primary School, Baihar, Through: The Head
   Master, Government Primary School, Baihar, Block Arang,
   District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
7. Government Primary School, Samoda Through: The Head
   Master, Government Primary School, Samoda, Block Arang,
   District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
                                                 2




    8. Government Middle School, Samoda, Through: The Head
       Master, Government Middle School, Samoda, Block Arang,
       District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
    9. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department Of
       Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District
       Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
                                                                       ---- Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Petitioners : Mr.T.K.Nande, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr.Rajkumar Gupta & Mr.Bhupendra Singh, Advocates For Respondents No.2 to 9 : Ms Ashtha Shukla, P.L.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 12/1/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that identical nature of writ petition has already been decided by this Court. One such writ petition is WP(S) No.6430 of 2016, which was decided on 25.11.2016.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact that nature of relief sought for by the petitioners is similar to WP(S) No.6430 of 2016.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is also disposed of. The petitioners are directed to make the representations before respondent No.2, who in turn, shall consider the representations of the petitioners in the light of of judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Jagjit Singh & Ors., decided on 26th October, 2016 and shall pass an appropriate speaking order on its own merit as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the representations. 3

4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/-

S (P. Sam Koshy) Judge B/-