Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Najru vs Decd.Batul Bai on 13 March, 2023

Author: Vivek Rusia

Bench: Vivek Rusia

                                   HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE

                                            MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 1001 TO 1054
                                Indore, dated 13/03/2023
                                        The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate
                                passing of identical conditional order in these matters involving similar office
                                objection/default.
                                        In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within the
                                prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the
                                Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar granted sufficient time to the
                                petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office objection, however,
                                due to non-removal of office objection/default within the prescribed time, the
                                concerned matter was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court
                                granted further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.
                                        In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules, second by the
                                Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/ applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed
                                to cure the office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last
                                opportunity, in terms of this order, SIX WEEKS' further time is granted to the
                                petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office
                                objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that time,
                                failing which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for
                                non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.
                                        Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is about non-
                                service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the

concerned matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing /scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

Sr. No.1001 to 1020 Returnable Date- 27/04/2023 Sr. No.1021 to 1040 Returnable Date- 28/04/2023 Sr. No.1041 to 1054 Returnable Date- 01/05/2023 (VIVEK RUSIA) JUDGE Divyansh Signature Not Verified Signed by: DIVYANSH SHUKLA Signing time: 13-03-2023 15:01:33