Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

A.K.Sreekumaran vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 11 April, 2014

Author: V. Chitambaresh

Bench: V.Chitambaresh

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

                 TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2014/2ND VAISAKHA, 1936

                                   WP(C).No. 11192 of 2014 (Y)
                                      ----------------------------

PETITIONER(S) :
--------------------------

        1. A.K.SREEKUMARAN
            AMARAVATHI, PUNNAVILA, OORUTTUKALA
            NEYYATTINKARA P.O.
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
            (ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KATTAKADA DEPOT)

        2. A.NAZEEMA
            MUTHIRAPARAMPIL HOUSE, THEVALYP.O.,
            KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 009
            (ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KOLLAM DEPOT)

            BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN

RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------

        1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
            REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
            TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

        2. CONVENER
            DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE
            KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
            TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

        3. V.SURESH KUMAR
            ENQUIRY OFFICER
            KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
            TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

            R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SC, KSRTC


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 22-04-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:


Mn

                                                                          ...2/-

WP(C).No. 11192 of 2014 (Y)
----------------------------------------

                                                      APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
-------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1:          COPY OF THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
                     REGULATIONS, 1988.

EXHIBIT P2:          COPY THE PROMOTION ORDER DATED 11/4/2014 ISSUED FROM THE
                     1ST RESPONDENT CORPORATION.

EXHIBIT P3:          COPY OF CHARGE SHEET DATED 3/12/2013 ISSUED TO THE 1ST
                     PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P4:          COPY OF CHARGE SHEET DATED 3/12/2013 ISSUED TO THE 2ND
                     PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P5:          COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED ON 20.03.2009 IN W.P(C)NO.1646/2008 OF
                     HIS HONOURABLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P6:          TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 11/4/2014 OF THE 1ST
                     PETITIONER SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P7:          TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 12/4/2014 OF THE 2ND
                     PETITIONER SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :                              NIL
------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                    //TRUE COPY//




                                                                    P.S. TO JUDGE
Mn



                          V. CHITAMBARESH, J.
        ............................................................................
                         W.P.(C) No.11192 of 2014
         ...........................................................................
               Dated this the 22nd day of April, 2014.

                                    JUDGMENT

The petitioners lament that they have not been included in the select list for promotion to the post of Personnel Officer/Accounts Officer. This is obviously for the reason that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioners have not yet been finalised. The petitioners have filed Exts. P6 and P7 representations seeking to expedite the disciplinary proceedings. The petitioners have also sought for considering them for promotion since only a minor penalty would at best be imposed.

2. I direct the second respondent to consider Exts. P6 and P7 representations with notice to the petitioners. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS