Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Bombay High Court

Dabhol Veej Prakalp Kamgar Sangh vs Ratnagiri Gas And Power Private Limited ... on 18 October, 2022

Author: M. S. Karnik

Bench: M. S. Karnik

                                                                      21. IA 2358-22.doc

           Diksha Rane

         Digitally         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         signed by
         DIKSHA                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
DIKSHA   DINESH
DINESH   RANE
RANE     Date:
         2022.10.18            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2358 OF 2022
         18:22:38
         +0530                                 IN
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 3892 OF 2017

                      DABHOL VEEJ PRAKALP KAMGAR SANGH            ..APPLICANT

                      IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

                      RATNAGIRI GAS AND POWER PRIVATE
                      LIMITED                                    ..PETITIONER
                                 VS.
                      DABHOL VEEJ PRAKALP KAMGAR SANGH
                      & OTHERS                                   ..RESPONDENTS
                                                ------------
                      Mr. Sanjay Singhvi, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. G. R. Thombare
                      for the applicant.
                      Mr. Vishal Talsania a/w. Ms. Kalyani Wagle i/b. T. N. Tripathi
                      & Co. for the petitioner.
                      Mr. A. R. Bamne i/b. A. R. Bamne & Co. for respondent
                      no.5.
                                                ------------
                                             CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
                                             DATE    : OCTOBER 18, 2022.
                      P.C. :

1. Mr. Vishal Talsania, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the apprehension of the applicant in the present interim application is not well founded as the petitioner in the regular course of business intends to continue the existing contract with Utility Power TecH Limited which will be continued for a further period of one (1) year. This will take care of the concern of 123 1

21. IA 2358-22.doc employees.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 5-Konkan LNG Private Limited states that if any adverse action in respect of 15 employees are concerned is to be taken, the same would not be taken without the leave of this Court.

3. Stand over to 29/11/2022.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) 2