Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Oracle Capac Services Limited ... vs Dy Commissioner Of Imcome Tax Cpc And Anr on 4 March, 2021

Author: Rajiv Shakdher

Bench: Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh

$~15-17(Advance)
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+      W.P.(C) 14059/2018
       ORACLE CAPAC SERVICES LIMITED EASTPOINT BUSINESS
       PARK , FAIRVIEW, DUBLIN3, IRELAND.              .....Petitioner
                     Through: Mr. G.C. Srivastava, Advocate
                     versus
       DY COMMISSIONER OF IMCOME TAX CPC AND ANR.
                                                    .....Respondent
                     Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate

+      W.P.(C) 14060/2018
       ORACLE CORPARTION SINGAPORE PTE LTD                        .....Petitioner
                    Through: Mr. G.C. Srivastava, Advocate
                    versus
       DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC          .....Respondent
                    Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate

+      W.P.(C) 28/2019
       ORACLE AMERICA INC                                         .....Petitioner
                    Through: Mr. G. C. Srivastava, Advocate
                    versus
       DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC & ANR.
                                                   .....Respondents
                               Through:   Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
                    ORDER

% 04.03.2021 [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] W.P.(C) 14059/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 2

1. Mr. G.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, says that during the pendency of the captioned matters, two significant events had occurred.

(i) First, the petitioner's return for the Assessment Year 2016-2017 has been processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act").
(ii) Second, an application for rectification was preferred under Section 154 of the Act- although up until now, no order has been passed on the said application.

2. Given this position and the stand taken before us by Mr. Srivastava, the Revenue is directed to dispose of the petitioner's application under Section 154 of the Act within four weeks from today. 2.1. In the event, the order passed qua the said rectification application is adverse to the interests of the petitioner, the petitioner will have the liberty to take recourse to an appropriate remedy, albeit, as per law.

3. At this stage, Mr. Srivastava says that he will transmit a copy of the said rectification application to Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, who appears for the Revenue, during the course of the day via e-mail. 3.1 Mr. Srivastava's statement is taken on record.

4. The matters are disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J TALWANT SINGH, J MARCH 4, 2021/mr Click here to check corrigendum, if any W.P.(C) 14059/2018 & connected matters Page 2