Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Bdr Builders And Developers Private ... vs Shri Mukesh Kumar Gupta (Since ... on 22 February, 2023

Author: Prateek Jalan

Bench: Prateek Jalan

                            $~39
                            *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                            +      O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 47/2023

                                   BDR BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
                                   PRIVATE LIMITED                            ..... Petitioner
                                                 Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar and Ms. Sunanda
                                                          Tulsyan, Advocates.

                                                              versus

                                   SHRI MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED)
                                   THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES           ..... Respondent
                                                Through: Ms. Jasmine Sahni, Advocate for R
                                                         Nos. 1, 3 and 4.

                            CORAM:
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

                                                    ORDER

% 22.02.2023 I.A. 3533/2023 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed of.

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 47/2023

1. The present petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed seeking extension of the mandate of the learned sole Arbitrator, who is adjudicating disputes between the parties under an agreement to sell dated 19.07.2014.

2. Issue notice. Ms. Jasmine Sahni, learned counsel, appears on advance notice, and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4. Although the respondent Nos. 2, 5 and 6 were also represented Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHITU NAGPAL Signing Date:22.02.2023 19:15:15 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 47/2023 Page 1 of 2 before the learned Arbitrator through counsel, Mr. Akhil Sachar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the learned counsel appearing on their behalf before the learned Arbitrator has informed him that he no longer represents the said respondents.

3. In this view of the matter, notice may be served upon the respondent Nos. 2, 5 and 6 by all permissible modes at their addresses mentioned in the memo of parties. Dasti service, in addition, is also permitted. Affidavit of service be filed within one week after service.

4. Ms. Sahni states that she has no objection to the relief sought in this petition, although the contents of the petition are not admitted by her clients.

5. List on 20.03.2023.

PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 22, 2023 'vp'/ Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHITU NAGPAL Signing Date:22.02.2023 19:15:15 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 47/2023 Page 2 of 2