Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

Dcit Cir 2(2)(1), Mumbai vs Industrial Investment Trust Ltd, ... on 9 October, 2017

 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL " I" BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM


                         ITA No. 5628/Mum/2015
                               (A.Y:2008-09)

The Dy. Commissioner                of         Industrial Investment Trust
Income Tax,                                    Ltd.
Circle-2(2)(1), Mumbai                         28, Rajabahadur Mansion ,
                                         Vs.
                                               2nd       Floor,     Bombay
                                               Samachar       Marg,   Fort,
                                               Mumbai-400 001
            Appellant              ..                  Respondent
                          PAN No.AAACI1262R

           Revenue by                    ..    Shri Saurabh Kumar Rai, DR
           Assessee by                   ..    None
Date of hearing                          ..    09-10-2017
Date of pronouncement                    ..    09-10-2017


                                    ORDER


PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM:

This appeal by the Revenue is arising out of the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-47 Mumbai, [in short CIT(A)] in appeal No. CIT(A)-IT-929/13-14/118-15-16 dated 14-09-2015. The Assessment was framed by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle- 2(2), Mumbai (in short DCIT or AO ) for the A.Y. 2008-09 vide order dated 31-01-2014 under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter 'the Act').

2. At the outset, the learned Sr. DR fairly stated the position that the quantum under dispute in this appeal of Revenue is only amounting to Rs. 23,58,665/- and, the tax effect on the same is Rs. 8,19,788 as reported by the AO. In such situation, the tax effect is below the prescribed limit i.e. less than 10 lakhs, as notified by CBDT Circular 2 I T A N o . 5 6 2 8 / Mu m / 2 0 1 5 Industrial Investment Trust Ltd. (AY 08-09) No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 brought out by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. The learned DR stated that tax effect involved wherein the disputed tax amount is Rs. 8,19,788/-, which is below Rs 10 lakhs. As the tax effect is below the prescribed limit, revenue is barred from filing of this appeal before the Tribunal. Hence, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed as unadmitted.

3. In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed as unadmitted.

Order pronounced in the open court on 09-10-2017.

              Sd/-                                                       Sd/-
     (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL)                                       (MAHAVIR SINGH)
       ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                          JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated: 09 -10-2017
Sudip Sarkar /Sr.PS
Copy of the Order forwarded to:
1.    The Appellant
2.    The Respondent.
3.    The CIT (A), Mumbai.
4.    CIT
5.    DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6.    Guard file.                                                        //True Copy//
                                                                          BY ORDER,
                                                                   Assistant Registrar
                                                                      ITAT, MUMBAI