Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Nandu Pasi vs The State Of Bihar on 25 July, 2017

Author: Vinod Kumar Sinha

Bench: Vinod Kumar Sinha

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Criminal Miscellaneous No.29568 of 2017
                  Arising Out of PS.Case No. -189 Year- 2016 Thana -CHENARI District- SASARAM (ROHTAS)
                 ======================================================
                 1. Nandu Pasi Son of Sri Chait Pasi, resident of Village- Malhipur, Police
                 Station- Chonari, District- Rohtas.

                                                                               .... ....   Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 1. The State of Bihar

                                                                 .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :  Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta
                 For the Opposite Party/s   : Mr. Sri Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA
                 ORAL ORDER

3   25-07-2017

Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Chenari P.S.Case No.189 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the D.P. Act.

The petitioner is husband and the case is of dowry death.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the F.I.R. itself shows that the deceased was under treatment but further allegation is that she was strangulated, which appears to be self-contradictory and the allegation of demand of dowry and cruelty is also vague. The petitioner is in custody for about seven months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29568 of 2017 (3) dt.25-07-2017

2/2

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of one year.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/-

  U        T