Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Subkriksha vs State Of U.P. on 9 January, 2020

Author: Saumitra Dayal Singh

Bench: Saumitra Dayal Singh





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 71
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1285 of 2020
 

 
Applicant :- Subkriksha
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- P.K. Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
 

1. Heard Sri P.K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Abhishek Singh, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Subkriksha with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. - 552 of 2019, under Sections - 452, 326, 336, 323, 506 I.P.C., Police Station - Sirsaganj, District - Firozabad, during pendency of trial.

3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, at present:

(i) the applicant is accused of offence of causing grievous hurt and other offences, punishable with imprisonment upto life;
(ii) against FIR lodged on 04.10.2019, the applicant is in confinement since 08.10.2019;
(iii) the applicant claims to have cooperated in the investigation. In any case he is not shown to have unduly evaded arrest;
(iv) the applicant has no criminal history;
(v) chargesheet has already been submitted yet trial has not commenced. Therefore, there is no hope of early conclusion of the trial;
(vi) on prima facie basis, only for purpose of grant of bail, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the parties are related and that they were in dispute from before over some immovable property. Then, it has been submitted that the allegation of acid attack has been doubted during investigation both by the informant as also medical opinion;
(vii) in any case, no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial.

4. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressuring the witness, during the investigation or trial.
(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

5. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, the bail being granted shall be cancelled.

6. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

Order Date :- 9.1.2020 Abhilash