Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Atriwal Infrastructure Limited, ... vs Dcit/ Acti on 2 December, 2025

Author: Vijay Kumar Shukla

Bench: Vijay Kumar Shukla

                                                               1                                WP-36297-2025
                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                        AT INDORE
                                                        WP No. 36297 of 2025
                            (ATRIWAL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, THROUGH DIRECTOR SHRI HEMANT ATRIWAL Vs DCIT/ ACTI
                                                               AND OTHERS )

                             WP/2916/2024, WP/15792/2024, WP/20290/2024, WP/25192/2024, WP/27434/2024,
                              WP/27588/2024, WP/4507/2025, WP/7190/2025, WP/7193/2025, WP/7195/2025,
                             WP/32408/2025, WP/32833/2025, WP/38020/2025, WP/38022/2025, WP/38653/2025
                           Dated : 02-12-2025
                                    Shri Ashish Goyal - Advocate, Shri Gagan Tiwari - Advocate, Shri
                           P.M. Choudhary - Senior Advocate with Shri Madhav Khandelwal -
                           Advocate, Shri Atul Kumar Gupta - Advocate, Shri Siddharth Seth -
                           Advocate and Ms. Priyal Jain - Advocate for the petitioners.
                                    Shri Shantanu Sharma - Advocate with Ms.Yashika Bondwal -
                           Advocate and Shri Shashikant Bhati - Advocate for respondents.

The respondents may file the reply in those cases in which the reply is not filed by them.

It has been informed that the issue involved in all these petitions is pending before the Supreme Court for consideration and the matter is listed today.

Considering the fact that the issue is pending for consideration, the hearing of these cases is adjourned.

In the cases where the name of standing counsel for the respondent(s) is not reflected, it is directed that the name of Shri Harsh Parashar and Shri Shantanu Sharma be reflected in the cause list.

The petitions in which the amendment has already been allowed, Registry is directed to permit the counsel for the petitioners to carry out the amendment.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Signing time: 03-12-2025 10:26:52

2 WP-36297-2025 List all these matters in the week commencing 12.01.2026 . Interim order, if any, shall continue.





                              (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)                           (BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI)
                                      JUDGE                                          JUDGE
                           soumya




Signature Not Verified
Signed by: SOUMYA
RANJAN DALAI
Signing time: 03-12-2025
10:26:52