Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai

Raghunandan Deodas vs Dgqa on 16 January, 2025

                              1                     OA No.721/2021

           CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
                MUMBAI BENCH, MUMBAI

          ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.721 OF 2021

      Dated this Thursday, the 16th day of January, 2025

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. SHRI KRISHNA, MEMBER (A)
        HON'BLE SHRI UMESH GAJANKUSH, MEMBER (J)

Raghunandan Deodas S/o Ravindranath Deodas,
Aged 55 years, Working as Jr. Technical Officer (D)
In CQA (SV), Garden City, Dehu Road, Pune 412 101,
Residing at Flat No.18, M Building,
Morya Gosavi Raj Park, Phase I, Keshav Nagar,
Chinchwad, Pune 411 033, (M) 9850900955,
Email ID : [email protected].               - Applicant

(By Advocate Shri Kanhaiya S. Yadav)

                            Versus

1.   Union of India, through the Secretary,
     Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi 110 011.

2.   Director General, Director General of Quality Assurance,
     Sena Bhavan, New Delhi 411 011.

3.   Additional Director (Vehicles) DGQA, Nirman Bhavan,
     G Block, New Delhi 411 011.

4.   Controller, CQA (Vehicles), Aurangabad Road,
     Ahmednagar 414 003.

5.   Controller, CQA (SV), Opp. Garden City, Dehu Road,
     Pune 412 101.                             - Respondents

(By Advocate Shri Sachin Patil)
                                                                                                                           2        OA No.721/2021


                                      ORAL ORDER
                              Per : Shri Krishna, Member (A)

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this OA has become infructuous as the applicant has filed fresh OA which is listed on today's Board before Court No.1 at Sl.No.27 bearing OA No.419/2024.

2. In view of the above submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant, the present OA is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

3. Pending MAs, if any, stand disposed of.

(UMESH GAJANKUSH)                                                                                                             (SHRI KRISHNA)
MEMBER (J)                                                                                                                      MEMBER (A)

                        Digitally signed by Khushboo Mittal Gupta

DN: C=IN, O=Personal, OID.2.5.4.65=6dbe5c2d6885491895b4fb8ef3642a0b, Phone= 8985c11fad2960cfbb159f98c2764347c7a4ffbc50d436d4fe5701484c759b92, PostalCode=411060, S= Khushboo Mittal Gupta Maharashtra, SERIALNUMBER=870759ef2f1952335c4269bf3698e2204e6521bc46faf0d3fefceadf0c12c639, CN= Khushboo Mittal Gupta Reason: I am the author of this document Location:

Date: 2025.01.21 16:40:22+05'30' Foxit PDF Reader Version: 12.1.2 kmg*