Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Pratapgadh Seva Sahakari Mandali ... vs State Of Gujarat & 4 on 24 March, 2017

Author: S.G. Shah

Bench: S.G. Shah

                       C/SCA/5646/2017                                             ORDER




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                          SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5646 of 2017

                   [On note for speaking to minutes of order dated 23/03/2017 in
                                         C/SCA/5646/2017 ]

         ==========================================================
                   PRATAPGADH SEVA SAHAKARI MANDALI LIMITED....Petitioner(s)
                                         Versus
                           STATE OF GUJARAT & 4....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR BHARAT T RAO, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 3 - 5
         ==========================================================

           CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. SHAH

                                         Date : 24/03/2017


                                          ORAL ORDER

Heard learned advocate for the petitioner. He has rightly pointed out that there is typographical error in the order dated 23.03.2017, in as much as, on second page of the order, word "allegations" is typed in place of word "elections". Therefore, such word is to be corrected accordingly. Note for speaking to minutes is disposed of. Direct Service is permitted.

(S.G. SHAH, J.) drashti Page 1 of 1 HC-NIC Page 1 of 4 Created On Sat Mar 25 00:42:34 IST 2017 1 of 4 C/SCA/5646/2017 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5646 of 2017 ========================================================== PRATAPGADH SEVA SAHAKARI MANDALI LIMITED....Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 4....Respondent(s) ========================================================== Appearance:

MR BHARAT T RAO, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR PRAKASH JANI, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL with MR NIRAJ ASHAR, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 3 - 5 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. SHAH Date : 23/03/2017 ORAL ORDER Heard   learned   advocate   Mr.B.T.   Rao   for   the  petitioner and Mr.Prakash Jani, learned AAG with  Mr.Niraj   Ashar,   learned   AGP   for   the   respondent  No.1. 
Learned   AAG   Mr.   Prakash   Jani   has   submitted  that   Mr.Naran   K.   Muchhar,   Deputy   Collector,  Wankaner   and   Mr.Dharmesh   V.   Gadhavi,   I/c.  District Registrar, Morbi are present before the  Court   and   on   instruction   and   discussion   with  them, the details that how election is to be held  Page 1 of 3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 4 Created On Sat Mar 25 00:42:34 IST 2017

2 of 4 C/SCA/5646/2017 ORDER is disclosed to the Court. 

Considering   the   facts   and   circumstances  emerging  from  the record,  it is rightly  pointed  out   by   learned   AAG   Mr.   Prakash   Jani   that   the  respondent   shall   take   necessary   endeavor   to   see  that   election   of   the   Wankaner   Taluka   Sahakari  Kharid   Vechan   Sangh   Limited   would   be   held   in  accordance with rule so as to complete the entire  election process on or before  30.6.2017. For the  purpose,   Deputy   Collector   will   carry   out   the  exercise   of   delimitation   of   Constitution   as   per  guidelines confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court  of   India   in   the   case   of  Rajkot   District  Cooperative   Bank   Limited   v.   State   of   Gujarat  reported   in   AIR   2015   SC   489.   It   is   made   clear  that since for such delimitation of Constitution  some correspondence and exercise was ongoing, the  respondent shall not take much time in completing  such exercise and shall see that allegations are  completed   on   or   before  30.6.2017,   without   fail.  However,   this   Court   has   not   entered   into   the  merits   of   the   dispute   between   the   parties   and,  therefore,   parties   are   at   liberty   to   raise   any  issue in appropriate proceeding, if so require.

This   petition   stands   disposed   of   with   the  above observation. Notice is discharged. 

Page 2 of 3

HC-NIC Page 3 of 4 Created On Sat Mar 25 00:42:34 IST 2017 3 of 4 C/SCA/5646/2017 ORDER (S.G. SHAH, J.) * Vatsal Page 3 of 3 HC-NIC Page 4 of 4 Created On Sat Mar 25 00:42:34 IST 2017 4 of 4