Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Shri S.Ramalingam Chettiyar vs The District Collector on 7 February, 2020

Author: P.D.Audikesavalu

Bench: P.D.Audikesavalu

                                                                              W.P.No.35500 of 2019


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 07.02.2020

                                                     C O RAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

                                              W.P.No.35500 of 2019
                                                      and
                                             W.M.P.No.36335 of 2019

                     Shri S.Ramalingam Chettiyar                          ... Petitioner
                                                           Vs.

                     1.The District Collector,
                       Office of the District Collector,
                       Thiruvanamalai District,
                       Thiruvanamalai-606 604.

                     2.Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,
                       Represented by its Senior Deputy General Manager,
                       No.1278/A, Ganapathy Street,
                       Thendral Nagar (South),
                       Thiruvanamalai.                                  ... Respondents
                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of
                     India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, to direct the District Collector,
                     Tiruvanamalai, First Respondent herein to reconsider the proceedings in
                     Na.Ka.No.M1/23075/2019 dated 02.12.2019 and pass consequential
                     order after considering the Petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2019

                     1/6



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                               W.P.No.35500 of 2019


                     sent to the District Collector, Tiruvanamali the First Respondent herein
                     on merits an in accordance with law, forthwith.
                                For Petitioner          : Mr.C.V.Vijayakumar
                                For Respondent 1        : Mr.R.Venkatesh
                                                              Government Advocate
                                For Respondent 2        : Mr.Thiagarajan
                                                              Senior Counsel
                                                          for M/s.Aiyar and Dolia


                                                     ORDER

Heard Mr. C.V.Vijayakumar, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. R.Venkatesh, Learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the First Respondent and Mr. Thiagarajan, Learned Senior Counsel for M/s Aiyar and Dolia who takes notice for the Second Respondent, and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2. The First Respondent exercising powers under Section 16(1) of 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.35500 of 2019 the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, had permitted the Second Respondent by order Na.Ka.no.M1/23075/2019 dated 02.12.2019, to erect electric towers in the land belonging to the Petitioner. The grievance sought to be redressed by the Petitioner in this Writ Petition is that before granting such permission, the Petitioner was not given any prior notice or afforded any opportunity of personal hearing to place his objections, which is in violation of the principles of natural justice and though the Petitioner has made a representation dated 14.12.2019 to reconsider the same, no action has been taken thereon.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the First Respondent submits that the aforesaid representation dated 14.12.2019 made by the Petitioner has been treated as an application made to remove or alter the route of the electric towers under Section 17(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and enquiry for the same has been commenced on 05.02.2020.

3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.35500 of 2019

4. In view of the aforesaid subsequent developments, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to challenge any order that the First Respondent may pass on the aforesaid application before the proper forum, if it is adverse to the interests of the Petitioner. He has also made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded. Though obvious, it is made clear that the First Respondent after affording full opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned (including the Petitioner and Second Respondent), shall consider each of the contentions raised by them and shall pass reasoned orders on merits and in accordance with law and communicate the decision taken to them under written acknowledgment and that till orders are passed by the First Respondent on the aforesaid application made by the Petitioner under Section 17(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, the Second Respondent shall not enter into the property of the Petitioner for erection of electric towers. 4/6 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.35500 of 2019

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving such liberty. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

07.02.2020 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vjt/ta Note: Issue order copy by 10.06.2020.

To The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Thiruvanamalai District, Thiruvanamalai-606 604.

5/6 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.35500 of 2019 P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.

vjt/ta W.P.No.35500 of 2019 07.02.2020 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in