Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Tufail Ansari vs State Of U.P. on 22 September, 2015

Bench: Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, Uday Umesh Lalit

     CHAMBER MATTER                                                SECTION II

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                REVIEW PETITION (Crl.) No. 548/2015
                                                 In
                                      SLP(Crl) No. 5112/2015

     TUFAIL ANSARI                                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

     STATE OF U.P.                                                 Respondent(s)

     (With application for condonation of delay in filing review
     petition and exemption from filing Official Translation and oral
     hearing)


     Date : 22/09/2015 This petition was circulated today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT


                                    By Circulation



                          UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Delay condoned.

The Review Petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

[KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Kalyani Gupta Date: 2015.10.01 16:13:22 IST Reason: [SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) No. 548 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO. 5112 OF 2015 TUFAIL ANSARI ….. PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ….. RESPONDENT O R D E R Application seeking oral hearing is rejected.

Delay condoned.

We have gone through the grounds urged in the review petition and the documents annexed thereto. We are not inclined to review our order referred to in this petition. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

…...…............................J [FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA] …................................J [UDAY UMESH LALIT] NEW DELHI SEPTEMBER 22, 2015.