Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Vicky & Anr vs State Of Haryana on 29 March, 2017

Author: Ritu Bahri

Bench: Ritu Bahri

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH


                                           CRM-M-42265 of 2016
                                           Date of Decision: 29.03.2017

Vicky and Anr.                                        ........Petitioners

                                Vs.

State of Haryana                                      ........Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:-      Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner.

              Ms.Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

              Mr.J.K.Sehrawat, Advocate, for the complainant.

                *****
RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL)

The prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.262 dated 20.10.2016 registered under Section 306/34/511 of IPC, registered at Police Station Uklana, District Hisar.

Learned counsel for the State has informed the Court that petitioners have joined investigation on 27.12.2016 and no further custodial interrogation is required in the matter qua the petitioners. He further submits that co-accused-Sadhu Ram has already been granted regular bail in the matter.

In view of the above, interim order dated 29.11.2016 is made absolute and the present petition is disposed of as such.

(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 29.03.2017 anil Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No 1 of 1 ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2017 16:10:00 :::