Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Zubair Aslam Jerry vs Sale Proceeds Of M T Aeon on 4 July, 2025

Author: Abhay Ahuja

Bench: Abhay Ahuja

                                                              27-IA-360-2025.doc


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               ADMIRALTY AND VICE ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION
                        IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2025
                                   IN
                COMMERCIAL ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 55 OF 2022

 ZUBAIR ASLAM JERRY AND OTHERS                         )...APPLICANTS
                               IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
 ZUBAIR ASLAM JERRY AND OTHERS                         )...PLAINTIFFS
      V/s.
 SALE PROCEEDS OF MT AEON(IMO 9576818)                 )
 AND ANOTHER                                           )...DEFENDANTS

 Mr.Navroze Seervai, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms.Neha Bhosale, Ms.Disha
 Parekh i/by NDB Law, Advocate for the Applicant.
 Mr.Abhishek Khare a/w. Mr.Amol Shirole i/by Khare Legal, Advocate
 for the Plaintiffs.
 Mr.Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Rishabh Saxena,
 Ms.Jyotika Jain, Mr.Shubham Agrahari i/by Bose & Mitra & Co.,
 Advocate for the Respondent no.2.

                                 CORAM    :    ABHAY AHUJA, J.
                                 DATE     :    4th JULY 2025

 P.C. :


1. Mr.Pratap, learned Senior Counsel, appears in the matter for Respondent no.2 and submits that since this matter had been argued in the month of February 2025 it would be necessary to refresh the avk 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 05/07/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 01/08/2025 22:39:46 ::: 27-IA-360-2025.doc memory, as the principal argument by Mr.Seervai was on the issue of possessory lien after the claim of the workmen, which the learned Counsel were ad idem, ranked at priority no.1. Mr.Seervai, learned Senior Counsel, however submits that some time be granted in this matter.

2. Although the adjournment is opposed by Mr.Pratap, learned Senior Counsel, since Mr.Seervai seeks some time, list this Interim Application on 8th August 2025 as Part heard.

3. It is understood between the learned Senior Counsel that although other connected matters have also been listed on that day, since Interim Application No.360 of 2025 is part heard, it will be heard first.

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) ARTI VILAS KHATATE Digitally signed by ARTI VILAS KHATATE Date: 2025.07.05 19:19:46 +0530 avk 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 05/07/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 01/08/2025 22:39:46 :::