Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Integrated with over 4 crore judgments and laws — designed for legal practitioners, researchers, students and institutions

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Bansi Lal Chauhan vs . State Of H.P & Ors. on 14 March, 2022

Author: Vivek Singh Thakur

Bench: Vivek Singh Thakur

Bansi Lal Chauhan vs. State of H.P & Ors.

.

CWPOA No.88 of 2019 14.03.2022 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for petitioners.

No.1,2 and 4.

Petitioner No.3 stands deleted vide order dated 06.11.2020 Mr. Dinesh Thakur, additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2.

Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for proposed respondents No. 3,5,6,9,17,19,23,24,40,43,47,48,50,54 and 56.

Ms.Kanta Thakur, Advocate, for proposed respondents No. 10,36 and 55.

Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate, for proposed respondent No.15.

Mr. K.C Sankhyan, Advocate, for proposed respondents No. 7,26,35,38,58,72 and 75.

Mr. Jai Dev Thakur, Advocate, for proposed respondents No. 11, 20, 21, 25, 27, 29, 30, 32 to 34,44,49,51,52,60,63,64,66,70,76,77 and 78 Proposed respondents No. 4,8,12 to 14,16,18,22,28,31,39,41,42,45,46,53,57,59,61,62,65,66, 67,69,73,74,79 to 82 already ex parte vide order dated 10.11.2021.

None for respondents No. 37,68 and 71.

CWPOA No.88 of 2019

Respondents No. 37 Vinod Thakur, 68 Thakur Dass (old69) and 71 Lal Chand (old 72) have duly been served but there is no representation on their behalf, hence proceeded ex­ parte.

In view of order passed on previous date, no further opportunity for filing reply is to be granted. No rejoinder is ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2022 20:11:21 :::CIS intended to be filed to the reply(ies) already filed. Case is complete.

.

List for hearing in 2nd week of April, 2022.

CMP­T No.1092 of 2021

List for consideration along with main petition.

It has already been ordered on 31.12.2021 that any action taken by the respondents­State shall be subject to final outcome of the petition.

CMP­T No.95 of 2022

No reply intended to be filed on behalf of petitioners. Reply on behalf of respondents, as prayed be filed within two weeks.

List for consideration along with main petition on next date.

(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge March 14, 2022 (veena) ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2022 20:11:21 :::CIS