Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Kamakhya Singh Deo vs Modula India on 12 September, 2019

Author: Ashis Kumar Chakraborty

Bench: Ashis Kumar Chakraborty

                                 ORDER SHEET


                                 GA 1458 of 2016
                                 CS 568 of 1979
                     IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                                 ORIGINAL SIDE



                           KAMAKHYA SINGH DEO
                                 Versus
                              MODULA INDIA

  BEFORE:

  The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY

  Date : 12th September, 2019.

                                                   Mr. Raja Basu Chowdhury, Adv.
                                                                  ... for petitioner



     The Court : In this application the petitioner, as a decree-holder in an

eviction suit has prayed for an order of appointment of a Commissioner for

determination of mesne profits payable by the respondent/judgment debtor in

respect of the suit property for the period between August 3, 1979 and August 18, 2014 in terms of the decree dated August 24, 2012.

As directed on August 21, 2019 the petitioner/decree-holder has published a notice of this application in the English newspaper, "The Asian Age". Let the 2 affidavit of compliance filed by the petitioner be kept on record. However, the respondent/judgment debtor remains unrepresented.

Accordingly, Mr. Amitabha Ghosh, Advocate of Bar Library Club (First Floor) is appointed as the Commissioner to determine the mesne profits, payable by the judgment debtor in respect of the aforementioned suit property for the period mentioned above. The Commissioner shall be paid a consolidated remuneration of Rs.1 lakh to be borne by the parties in equal share. In the event the judgment debtor does not participate in the proceeding before the Commissioner or refuses to pay his share of the Commissioner's fees, the petitioner/decree-holder shall pay the entire remuneration of the Commissioner. The Commission is made returnable within the month of January, 2020.

The Commissioner may issue a notice of the proceeding through the petitioner by publishing a notice in the same English newspaper, "The Asian Age". If the respondent/judgment debtor does not participate in the proceeding before the Commissioner, the latter shall be entitled to conclude the commission ex parte as against the respondent/judgment debtor. The Commissioner shall return the commission within January 31, 2020.

Further, the Registrar, Original Side is directed to forthwith encash the fixed deposit maintained by him with the concerned bank, with the amount deposited by the respondent/judgment debtor in terms of the order dated September 13, 2018, read with the Division Bench orders dated October 3, 2012 3 and March 18, 2013 and make over the proceeds thereof to the petitioner, after deducting the statutory commission.

With the above directions, the application, GA 1458 of 2016 stands disposed of.

(ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY, J.) SN.