Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Sanjit Sarkar vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited And 10 ... on 17 December, 2025

Author: Devashis Baruah

Bench: Devashis Baruah

                                                                   Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010220612025




                                                            undefined

                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C)/5781/2025

         SANJIT SARKAR
         S/O SRI SAMARENDRA KUMAR SARKAR, R/O FLAT NO. 3A, HOUSE NO. 67,
         SHRISTI ENCLAVE, BYE- LANE NO. 1 , AJANTA PATH, SURVEY, BELTOLA,
         GUWAHATI-781028, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM



         VERSUS

         INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND 10 ORS.
         REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT
         INDIAN OIL BHAVAN, 3079/3, SADIQ NAGAR, J.B. TITO MARG, NEW DELHI-
         110049

         2:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (LPG)
          INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.
          INDIAN OIL BHAWAN
          G-9
         ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG
          BANDRA (EAST)
          MUMBAI - 400051
          MAHARASHTRA.

         3:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (LPG)
          INDIAN OIL AOD STATE OFFICE
          INDIAN OIL BHAVAN
          INDIAN OIL AOD STATE OFFICE
          SECTOR III
          NOONMATI
          GUWAHATI- 781020
          DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO)
         ASSAM

         4:THE MANAGER (LPG-OPS)
                                               Page No.# 2/4

INDIAN OIL BHAVAN
INDIAN OIL AOD STATE OFFICE
SECTOR III
NOONMATI
GUWAHATI 781020 DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM

5:NATIONAL CREDIT GUARANTEE TRUSTEE COMPANY
 REPRESENTED BY ITS NON EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
 1410
 14TH FLOOR
 PARINEE CRESCENZO
 PLOT NO. C38 AND C39
 G BLOCK
 BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX
 BANDRA EAST
 MUMBAI 400051
 MAHARASHTRA.

6:BANK OF INDIA
 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
 HEAD OFFICE
 STAR HOUSE
 C-5
 G BLOCK
 BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX
 BANDRA (EAST)
 MUMBAI- 400051
 MAHARASHTRA.

7:THE BRANCH MANAGER
 BANK OF INDIA
 DULIAJAN BRANCH
 B.P. ENCLAVE
TIPLING ROAD
 P.O- DULIAJAN
 DISTRICT- DIBRUGARH
 PIN- 786602
ASSAM.

8:DHEERAJ KUMAR VALMIKI
 RESIDENT OF OIL COLONY
 QTR NO. SAP- 2041
 P.O- DULIAJAN
 DISTRICT- DIBRUGARH
 PIN- 786602
 KAMRUP (METRO)
ASSAM
                                                                     Page No.# 3/4


            9:UNION OF INDIA
             REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
             DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
             MINISTRY OF FINANCE
             JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING
             SANSAD MARG
             NEW DELHI- 110001

            10:MANORAMA KALITA
             CARE OF PRADIP KALITA
             R.O. SAPARA
             P.O. JHAROBARI
             DIST- KARMUP
            ASSAM
             PIN 781122

            11:PALASHI ENTERPISE
             REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MRS. GEETA MEDHI
             49 YEARS
             CARE OF NIREN MEDHI
             VILL. HUDUMPUR
             P.O. PALASHBARI
             DIST KAMRUP
            ASSAM
             PIN 78112

For the Petitioner(s)   : Mr. K. P. Pathak, Advocate

For the Respondent(s)   : Mr. N. Baruah, Standing Counsel
                        : Mr. A. Ganguly, Advocate
                        : Ms. K. Phukan, CGC
                        : Mr. D. S. Deka, Standing Counsel
                        : Mr. M. Sarma, Advocate




                                   BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

                                       ORDER

Date : 17.12.2025 Mr. A. Ganguly, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank of India submitted that taking into account the decision of the Central Page No.# 4/4 Government more particularly the Respondent No.5 whereby the SUIS Scheme have been withdrawn, the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 have duly intimated the Respondent No.8 as well as the IOCL that the Bank of India have withdrawn their offer to the Respondent No.8 as regards financing his project.

2. Mr. N. Baruah, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 submitted that he would obtain instructions as to whether the Bank of India have intimated the IOCL Authorities about withdrawing their finance to the project of the Respondent No.8 and if that be so, the IOCL would reject the Letter of Acceptance so issued to the Respondent No.8. Mr. N. Baruah, the learned Standing counsel submits that some time is required in that regard.

3. Accordingly, list this matter again on 09.01.2026 in the admission column for an update.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant