Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 109]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

M.S. Middle High School vs Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. on 22 November, 2017

Bench: Adarsh Kumar Goel, Uday Umesh Lalit

     ITEM NO.3                         COURT NO.11                 SECTION IV-B

                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 31406/2017

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-09-2017
     in FAO No. 7555/2015 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana
     At Chandigarh)

     M.S. MIDDLE HIGH SCHOOL                                        Petitioner(s)
                                                VERSUS

     HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.                    Respondent(s)
     (With interim Relief)

     Date : 22-11-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

     For Petitioner(s)             Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                            O R D E R

Heard.

We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order.

The High court rightly held that once there is breach of condition of policy, the liability cannot be fastened on the insurer. The High Court had relied upon decisions of this Court in National Insurance Company Limited v. Challa Bharathamma and Others, (2004) 8 SCC 517, New India Assurance Company Limited v. Asha Rani & Ors., (2003) 2 SCC 223 and National Insurance Company Limited v. Nicolleta Rohtagi & Ors., (2002) 7 SCC 456.

The contrary view in Augustine, V.M. v. Ayyappankutty and Ors., 2015 (1) TN MAC 740 (FB) (Ker.) cannot thus be held to be valid and is disapproved to the extent holding that insurer was liable even if there was breach of conditions of policy.

The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(MAHABIR SINGH) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER Signature Not Verified COURT MASTER Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH Date: 2017.11.23 10:31:32 IST Reason: