Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Jaydevbhai vs General on 4 July, 2011

Author: Abhilasha Kumari

Bench: Abhilasha Kumari

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/7562/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7562 of 2011
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

JAYDEVBHAI
M NANVANI - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

GENERAL
MANAGER (ATM-NOC) & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
APURVA R KAPADIA for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 1 -
3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HON'BLE
			SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 04/07/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER 

Heard Mr. Apurva R. Kapadia, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is submitted by him that the petitioner had preferred an appeal to the Appellate Committee-N.O.C. against the orders dated 07.07.2010 and 20.08.2010, through the Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India. However, the petitioner did not get any response from the respondent-authority regarding whether a decision has been taken in the appeal, or not. The petitioner filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005, in response to which, he was given order dated 27.01.2011, issued by the Executive Director(ATM), who is the First Appellate Authority. In the said order, it is mentioned that if the petitioner so desires, he may appeal for higher height to the Chairman, Appellate Committee, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed the said appeal to the Appellate Committee, which has not been decided.

Notice, returnable on 26.07.2011.

In addition to the normal mode of service, Direct Service is also permitted.

(Smt. Abhilasha Kumari, J.) Safir*     Top