Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Karnataka High Court

State Of Karnataka vs Sri Amol Arun Shah on 25 August, 2008

Author: Manjula Chellur

Bench: Manjula Chellur

4§{By srizugfigdgi Math, HCGP)

xx THE axes conar ow KA3fi§iA&§£l;f_'
cracuzr azncg AT nHa:fi§pl=f
DATED wars was zséfi pl&ls§l§hGfié@f2§§gi
«_9RE§a$§- ' l V' l l V
HON'BLE Mms.éfi$§Ic: M£a:fiL$ cfigfifiua
H.l®§fll  '-. 5

HON'BLE Ma Josrzég ggfijggsfiavananaxana

4fs=¢nfmmfini A§g§A$"Na.433/zoos

$tate'Gf,Ka3nataka,
by Eixtzgs' r1'r:.sg»ec'i:.9f*,--. '
Belgaum Cir¢lé;."~»"
Belgaum. ' 4' »-- A'

. . Appellant

"=rs§i gmga Arum Shah,

Proprietor of

 M/"gs. Vvardhaznan Medical 3'.

"jraluk: Athani.

sggeral stares, VPC Nb.231,
Rajwada Chow]-ca , Mangasuli ,

. . Respondent

This Crl.A. is filed "under section 377 of Cr.P.C by the state P.P for the State praying that this Hon'bla Chart may be pleased to allow this Cr:i.1'£d.na.1 Appeal. by nnodifying the sentence K ' fpzamrs "rete:'.n.i;ng the ozcdezc sheet.

imposed by the learned Aaa1.civ11 auegeV;Jr.nn.) ; JMFC., Athani, dated 31.12.2007 ifi<¢;C;No.495 of 2007 and imose appropriate senten<_:_ e5 against the respondent herein for the"--offeneeflunder Saa.18(c) of the Act and punish;b1e.t§dex seetign 27(1)) (11) of the Dr=zgs__A<;t_. ' This C:-l.A corningV'».1'on:_"'r£?)rA "

Mmxauna cnanren J, de1ivered_the £911aw1ng:_'; a§UDaMefim.'. ' xv" V ' Heard reg:q:d3.ng- _ 'obj eétiene .

2. The Stete is permitted to withdrew the; present before the zvsessitéee. ¢r§s.;r"s:, ' gem.

directed to return all the sa/-3"

Judge 35/4,.
Judge