Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Elephant G.Rajendran vs P.T.Perumal on 28 February, 2019

Author: M.M.Sundresh

Bench: M.M.Sundresh

                                                        1

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 28.02.2019

                                                     CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

                                     Contempt Petition No.1407 of 2014


                      Elephant G.Rajendran, Advocate,
                      'A' Block, III Floor D.No.7,
                      Silver Park Apartment,
                      No.36, Thanikachlam Road,
                      T.Nagar, Chennai-17.                                  ... Petitioner

                                                        Vs.


                      P.T.Perumal, A/o Thanumaalaya Perumal,
                      Advocate, No.1`, Professor Senjeevi Street,
                      Mylapore, Chennai-4.                            ...    Respondent

                           Contempt petition is filed under Article 215 of the Constitution

                      of India under Sections 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to

                      initiate suo-motu contempt proceeding for having committed the

                      contempt of this Court by misleading this Court and also by making

                      false representation before this Court without any locus or authority

                      whatsoever.



                           For Petitioner    : No appearance

                           For Respondent    : Mr.N.Rajan




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                        2


                                                                    M.M.SUNDRESH,J.


                                                                                       raa


                                                   ORDER

When the contempt petition is taken up for hearing on 20.02.2019, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Even today, there is no representation. Therefore, this Court presumes that the petitioner himself of the view that no contempt has arisen. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.

28.02.2019 raa Cont. P. No.1407 of 2014 http://www.judis.nic.in