Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Aagam Pankajbhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat & on 25 August, 2015

Author: J.B.Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

                   R/CR.MA/15732/2015                                                  ORDER




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE
                                   FIR/ORDER) NO. 15732 of 2015

         ==========================================================
                            AAGAM PANKAJBHAI SHAH....Applicant(s)
                                          Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR. SAHIL M SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR KL PANDYA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
          
                                         Date : 25/08/2015 
                                           ORAL ORDER

1. Rule   returnable   forthwith.   Mr.   Pandya,   the   learned   APP  waives  service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1­ State  of   Gujarat.   Mr.   Hardik   Dave,   the   learned   advocate   waives   service   of  notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.2­ original first  informant.

2. By   this   application   under   Section   482   of   the   Code   of   Criminal  Procedure,   1973,   the   applicant­original   accused   seeks   to   invoke   the  inherent powers of this Court for quashing of the F.I.R. being C.R. No.I­ 53 of 2015 filed before the Bopal Police Station, Ahmedabad, for the  offence punishable under Sections­279, 337 and 427 of the I.P.C. and  Sections­177 and 184 of the Motor Vehicle Act.

3. The   quashing   of   the   FIR   is   prayed   for   on   the   ground   that   the  parties   have   amicably   settled   the   dispute.   The   respondent   no.2  viz.Alpeshbhai Lakhabhai Raval has filed an affidavit inter­alia stating as  Page 1 of 3 HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Sat Aug 29 02:03:39 IST 2015 R/CR.MA/15732/2015 ORDER under:­ I,   Alpeshbhai   Lakhabhai   Raval,   Male,   aged:23   years,   residing   at   Bopal­Guma   Road,   Pipadwado­Mad,   Village   Bopal,   Tal:   Dascroi,   Dist.:Ahmedabad,   do   hereby   solemnly   affirm   and   state   on   oath   as   under:­

1. I am permanent resident address mentioned above. I state and   submit   that   I   have   registered   an   FIR   registered   with   Bopal   Police   Station, vide I­C.R.No.53/2015 for the offences punishable U/Ss.279,   337 and 427 of IPC and Sections 177 and 184 of the Motor Vehicle   Act.

2. I state and submit that the matter is amicably settled and that I   do not wish to pursue the prosecution any further. Therefore, the FIR,   against the present applicant may kindly be quashed and set aside in  view of the settlement arrived at.  

3. I respectfully submit before this Hon'ble Court that the dispute   between   me   and   the   accused   person   have   been   amicable   settled   in   connection  with the FIR registered  by me with Bopal Police Station,   vide I­C.R.No.53/2015 for the offences punishable U/Ss.279, 337 and   427 of IPC and Sections 177 and 184 of the Motor Vehicle Act. I do   not intend to pursue the prosecution any further.

4. I respectfully submit that after the incident, I realize that there   was   no   negligence   on   the   part   of   the   applicant   and   unavoidable   circumstances   had   led   to   this   accident.   I   submit   that   the   applicant   should be made guilty for the same and therefore, I request that the   present FIR may be quashed and set aside by my consent."

He is personally present in the Court and he is being identified by  his learned advocate Mr. Hardik Dave.  He confirms about the settlement  arrived at with the accused.

4. Taking into consideration the nature of the dispute and the fact  that   the   parties   have   amicably   settled   the   dispute,   no   useful   purpose  would   now   be   served   to   allow   the   police   to   continue   with   the  investigation. 

5. In   the   result,   this   application   is   allowed.   The   F.I.R.   being   C.R.  No.I­53  of  2015   filed  before   the   Bopal   Police   Station,   Ahmedabad,  is  Page 2 of 3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Sat Aug 29 02:03:39 IST 2015 R/CR.MA/15732/2015 ORDER hereby ordered to be quashed. All consequential proceedings pursuant  thereto shall stand terminated.  

Rule is made absolute.  Direct service is permitted.

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.)  aruna Page 3 of 3 HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Sat Aug 29 02:03:39 IST 2015